Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Indian media inclination to destroy Hindu India and promote Islamic Christian interests

It is for the Indian Media that tilts in favor of some other communities like Communists, Leftists, Islamic followers, Converted Hindus into Christianity and any one who is not from Organic faith of Native India. Hence to expect any news or events related to genocide and ripping of Hindu rights would never ever be in any news in India and rest of South Asia. Non Muslim and non Christians are the most passive participants in so called democratic system hence their rights would be trampled and ripped off.

Indian media is geared to spread disinformation on Hindu India and call them Hindu fanatics while it pumps up the fanatic Christian and Islamic interests as victims.

Turkish people's tragedy

Türk arazi Trajedisi Turkish people's tragedy.
The great tragedy of Intelligent Turks vs. the oppressive Fanatic Erdogan's evil empire and his 600 Million $ palace.
How tragic. Most Turks with education were against the oppressive Erdogan but he won by tricking poorer resourceless Turks who are usually very "Muslim" for being induced by their "religious" preachers and Erdogan with their support tricked and got into power and now the liberated, Good people of Turkey, those who... really know all about the evil history and abuses of Turkish empire wanted to get rid. But hey do not worry, ERDOGAN and his oppression will not be permanent.
Turkish people are very smart. They will win. Viva Turg people
Türk insanı çok akıllı. Onlar kazanacak.
Yaşasın Türk halkı

Arya Samaj Scholar and teacher who was a Muslim Priest 30 years ago

Here you have an enlightened gentleman. He is Pandit Mahendra Pal from UP India. He was born in a Muslim Family and he was a Muslim priest. Soon enough he realized that the world around him was mostly artificial, fake and ridiculous unscientifically unreligious. There on he digged and found out Vedik Knowledge and he became a master of Aryan Vedic scriptures and since he is from India his genes are already pure Indian and since then he has not looked back. Muslims of India have a lot to learn from this scholar. I have studied South Asian, SE Asian Muslims in details 99.98 % converted Muslims and almost all of them have no real knowledge of Islamic literature and thought. They merely folllow it by following what they have heard. There is a scope for light and there are millions of Muslim borns who are interested to learn of other philosophies and ideas.
Arya Samaj Scholar and teacher
Pandit Mahendra Pal Arya is member of Arya Samaj. He is preaching Vedas, Comparative Religious Studies and removing confusions about Vaidik Sanskriti and Sanatan Dharma from last 29 Years.

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

What is real essence of "an Islamic Society?"

What is real essence of "an Islamic Society?"
Can Islamic society change and evolve with better practices  if its people are allowed and encouraged to introspect, criticize and evaluate the options?
Islamic society is not really a society to start with. It is an imbalanced system where; men driven, by a sick doctrine "follow" the book but since nobody can understand a cryptic stupid language of very basic raw life, the men deviate from its real meaning and only use it to draw their own conclusions. It is not different from some poorly written laws that are never understood by anyone and thus they are abused. Islamic society is basically based on an old beduin culture a subset of an old, extremely poor Arabian desert setup where there were no laws, only these camel, that goat and these women are "MINE" and if you intrude I will kill you. If the other party was stronger he would kill that man and he would take his herd, including women, as slave. This is the only real mind set that has prevailed and it is still live, living in certain Sahara tribes, where I have been and see how the things are still out of this world. From surface it may all look modern but the idea of that herd man with his animals and women is still continuing - a Muslim man thinks he OWNS his women and there is no difference between a woman and a slave. In fact Slavery is very much alive in almost all Muslim societies in different variables.

 The Saudis still own black African Abassinians [Habashis] slaves who are also castrated at times so that they do not mate with their women. Other Muslims those who can or have power try to maintain multiple slaves and women. In many Arabic speaking areas they also maintain male lovers. This is not a fantasy or a movie plot but very real. Mindset of converted Muslim is a mimicry of his Arab principal whom he tries to copy and he tries his best to behave like an Arab Muslim herdsman, and consider a woman he "wants" his property. If another fellow likes that property - then there is a battle and that woman goes to become property of other one.
Read Indian  [that includes West North India now known as Pakistan and East India Part known as Bangladesh] history and see how cruel lives these Islamic invaders and all their soldiers lived and how they tortured Hindu women and abused, murdered Hindu men for minor pretexts, when ever a Hindu woman was liked by a Muslim man with even minor power, her husband was given a choice and if he dint agree, he was killed mercilessly and his property and wife became property of this man.
This has been going on in India that is now known as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh and India. This is a tale of tragedy, horror and extreme pain. Islam on paper is a "religious doctrine" but in reality it is a very basic system of few simple rules and if anyone does not follow those rules he is punished.
That is why to consider this as a religion is a grave mistake. It is a shadowed dark idea of life that has everything black from clothes to mind to soul and everything is death, destruction and tragedy.
The converted Muslims behave in horrible ways and overdo and are dumb enough to believe they are being very religious by going by the book but they are in most cases totally oblivious of any real "religious purity" and any spiritual aspect is as missing as honesty and truthfulness in modern corrupt society. Islamic society is not a social system but a mode to oppress, pillage, control, subjugate and squeeze the basic rights of women, children, animals and all Men in every sense. To fool the world, they device million stories to obfuscate and hide the truth; which foolish gullible liberals believe and let them keep oppressing.

Is Islam for all people of the world?

Is Islam for all people of the world?
No it was not for Non Arabic Speaking people.
Islam has been used to plunder gold, assets and women of other cultures and destroy their temples and places of worship and install Islamic momument on top of them. Entire history of Islam is history of invasion, destruction, loot, appropriation of foreign lands, assets, women and animals and enslavement and murder of men and children. Originally the Quran was meant to be a holy book for Arabs only. Read on below
Muslims are tirelessly promoting Islam and claim that soon it will dominate the world. In doing so, they go against the Quran. Therefore, it is fair to say they are kafir.
Brother Ali Sina, who studied Islam in minucious details researched on this issue and found following revelations:
The Quran 10:47 says,
And for every people there is a Messenger.
And 14: 4 says,
And WE have not sent any Messenger except with revelation in the language of his people in order that he might make things clear to them.
If these verses are true, then Islam is not for non-Arabs. The Quran attests that every people have received their divine message in their own language so they can understand it and the Quran is for Arabs.
This concept is so important that it is repeated numerous times.
Q. 16:36.
And WE did raise among every people a Messenger
Q. 5:48
For each of you WE prescribed a clear spiritual Law and a manifest way in secular matters
Q. 32:3
It [the Quran] is the truth from your Lord; that you [Muhammad] may warn a people to whom no Warner has come before you, that they may be guided.
Q. 36.6
[This is a revelation] That thou mayest warn a people whose fathers were not warned, and so they are heedless.
These verses leave no room for misunderstanding. Allah is saying that every people has had their own messenger who warned them in their own language, and that Muhammad is for those who have not yet received any guidance, and whose fathers were not warned, i.e. the Arabs. In this way they won’t have any excuse and can’t say, but we did not receive any message.
Q. 6: 156- 157 explain,
Lest you should say, `The Book was sent down only to two peoples before us, (Jews and Christians) and we were indeed unaware of what they read.
Or lest you should say, `Had the Book been sent down to us, we should surely have been better guided than they.’ There has now come to you a clear evidence from your Lord and a guidance and a mercy.
The Quran is clear only to Arabs. Non Arabs don’t understand it. Muslims insist that no translation of the Quran can be accurate. Hence, it can never be clear to non-Arabs. That makes sense because it is not intended for non-Arabs.
Another confirmation that the Quran was sent only for the Arabs is in verses 26: 198-199
And if WE had sent it down to one of the non-Arabs, and he had read it to them, they would never have believed in it.
Just as Arabs have no reason to believe in a book written in a non-Arab language, non-Arabs have no reason to believe in a book written in Arabic. That is why Allah sends a messenger to each people in their own language so they understand. That makes perfect sense.
To make sure there is no misunderstanding the Quran 5:19 reiterates:
O People of the Book, there indeed has come to you Our Messenger, after a break in the series of Messengers, who makes things clear to you lest you should say, `There has come to us no bearer of glad tidings and no Warner.’ So a bearer of glad tidings and a warner has indeed come to you. And ALLAH has power over all things.
According to the Quran all people have received a revelation. The above verse says the Quran is for those who never received a revelation, lest they should say, `There has come to us no bearer of glad tidings and no Warner’.
This matter is clear, but Allah wants it to be clear even to the dumbest of people. He names the exact geographic location for which Muhammad was sent.
Q. 6:92
And this is a Book which WE have revealed, full of blessings, to fulfill that which preceded it, and to enable thee to warn the Mother of towns and those around it. أُمَّ الْقُرَى وَمَنْ حَوْلَهَا
The mother of towns, Umul Qura, is Mecca. This verse says Islam was sent to warn Mecca and its surrounding حَوْلَهَا. How can it be for all mankind?
Now this point is clear even to the dumbest of people, But "Allah" knows some people are really stupid and he wants to make this matter clear even to them. So he repeats the same thing in verse 42:7
Thus have WE revealed to you the Qur’an in Arabic, that you may warn the Mother of towns, and all those around it.
I heard some Muslims say, around it means everywhere. That is not the definition of around it. When we say Rome and around it, we don’t include Paris, London, Tokyo and New York as Romes surroundings. Those who bring this argument are saying that Allah says something and means something else. In other words he is deceiving people. The Quran repeatedly claims to be a “clear book” (5:15) “easy to understand” (44:58 , 54:22 , 54:32, 54:40) “explained in detail” (6:114), “conveyed clearly”, (5:16, 10:15) and with “no doubt” in it (2:1).
Now, I am sure some Muslims can quote other verses that say Islam is for all mankind. If they do so, they will prove that the above verses are false.

REFUGEES are destroying a new apartment

DONALD TRUMP WAS RIGHT !!
THIS IS ITALY !!!!!
REFUGEES are destroying a new apartment that was given to him by the municipality ' cause it's not up to their standards..... Where as the Italians are kicked out from their homes and sent to sleep under bridges !!!!!
#SHAREIT

https://www.facebook.com/daise1000/videos/1692202124363564/

Erdogan stages a constitutional coup

Erdogan stages a constitutional coup. Declares a 'State of Emergency' which means he will be able to rule by decree, bypassing parliament and the judiciary.
Well played Sultan, well played.
The world had forgotten 600 years of Ottoman barbarism over the Bulgars, Arabs, Kurds, Armenians, Greeks and Slavs. By the time its 100 year anniversary of the 1923 AtaTurk Republic, the Caliphate will be back and this time it will not be the 'Sick Man of Europe', but Europe's Son-in-Law that will rule over the 'Sick men of Europe'.

http://f24.my/2avdL4R

The real social status of women in Islamic countries

The real social status of women in Islamic countries
A so called religion's purpose is to connect with God but Islam does anything but that. Instead it teaches men to abuse children, women and encourages slavery and above all treat them in the most inhuman way possible. Obviously social pictures of a few rich and famous show bejewelled women who look very lavish but the reality is very very different inside the veil.
Majority of Muslim women, as much as 89% suffer more than... any other women born under any other social system or so called religious faith. On surface and text books, news media and public statements talk of great love and peace and nobility towards women. However the reality is that women are considered like 2nd hand shoes once worn and can be thrown or just placed in a shoe box as the man pleases. All these so called "religious" pretexts" and excuses that are published and quoted 24 hours by Islamic clergy and men is an entire bullshit that does not do anything but serves their nefarious purposes of abusing women in any way they can.
The face shown to the world is one of shyful niqabs and Purdah etc. and happy bunch of giggling women herded by long bearded men. However what is the ground reality?
The reality is that most Muslim women are coerced, violated, forced, raped and treated worse than enslaved women. As long as she is young and attractive she has a little value but once she is slightly old or has a child etc. or sick, men discards her as if she was a dead fly.
Muslim women have no real rights at all. The whole show that is shown to the world is a farce and a ridiculous public relation exercise, going on for past almost 13 centuries.

Selling of little girls, innocent women like cattle

People around the world are insensitive and quiet as if it was a common news. Selling of little girls, innocent women like cattle is not a symbolic devilishness of Islamic state but it is the actual reality of Islam. Look at the history from day one and the entire Islamic discourse is based on how to exploit, plunder, rape and enslave women. The world that is now quiet on this extremely hidden subject must now wake up as your own daughters and sisters could be in line for sale by the coming invading Islamic warriors who are currently portraying themselves as meek refugees but inside majority is a monsterous wolf hiding who will rip apart any civil society.
Any so called Western politicians, Apologizers and Islamic supporters are unperturbed as their own daughters are not yet ripped apart. Well just wait for a little time and they will see what happens in any neighbourhood near them.


http://pamelageller.com/2016/07/virgin-beautiful-12-years-old-she-will-be-sold-soon-in-islamic-slave-market.html/

Islam is not the fastest growing but fastest dying religious group

There are not thousands but Millions of Converts - recent and older generations in Black Africa who would like to leave, but what the world does not know is that most educated North Africans of Berber origin who previously were converted by Turks and Arabs, are interested to leave. The problems are no democracy and no social system that can sustain such apostates. Turkey has 30 to 40 % population too. The worst are converts specially the recent Bosnian, Albanian, Kosovans & of course in South and South East Asia who are more fanatic than the Arab Muslims.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnAfsjZZ0c8

Islamic Burqa is not by will or volition of women

NO sane woman ever uses Burqa or any cover except when she has to go certain places where Muslim men are present. Most emanicipated and 'freed' Muslim women who understand the fake theories of Islam; do not want to live under its stupid man created dictates. 99% of Muslim women hate the imposed so called Islamic restrictions with pretexts of a fake religion. On surface they will never admit or for their ignorance and poor understanding will be angry but in reality they wonder what Islam gives them.

Zakir Naik a dangerous man than many thousand hard core terrorists

This man an Indian citizen is a persona non grata in a few countries already but Indian Governing administration must solicit a total ban against his travels by issuing an alert as this man is equal to 10.000 terrorists. He is a dangerous man who is literally twice more dangerous than a Pakistan with the capacity of damage. This man is loved by Saudis and Pakistani terror groups. The network he has spread all over South Asia specially India is so vast that it may take a year to gauge its active members.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NI4GtRwfazk&feature=share

Defining a Gentleman called Tarek Fatah

Defining a Gentleman called Tarek Fatah - Jayen to Jayen Kahan?
Can we create a new category for people who are deprogrammed and have adhered to their spirit se...lf?
While it is true Muslims and Christians in South Asia specially are highly programmed creatures for not having a mind or not having been encouraged to have a thinking mind. That said not all fit in that category.
Know one thing only that having a "MUSLIM" or Arab name does not necessarily translate to being a linear follower of "political Islam". While one is logically right to label all Muslims as "terrorists or sympathizers" well they are sandviched between obnoxious and ethical, there is room for those who are born in "islamic" family or culture but they are not really so.

There are certain things that are beyond the so called Christianity or Islam or any proselytized faith.
Tarek Fatah is not alone but he perhaps is the tip of a big iceberg of Tarek Fatahs who can not be seen easily but they are like a a musical theme of fusion that can not be labelled under any known category or even genre.
Not all "Muslims" or "Christians" or Judaic Followers are fanatic or blind believer in the religious thought. There are some or rather many Muslims e.g. who are almost like trapped and they are more spirit oriented than book oriented. Tarek Fatah is more like that legendary bird that flies above the skies
There are a few things that hurt us a big deal yet we can never know what is it that hurts and this is one of those undefinable aspects of life that can not be worded however and perhaps we need to find a few new words to define the undefined. One sure thing one can add here is that there are now millions of ATHEISTS in "Islamic" world just as there are in "Christian" world who have no where to go and they park thems
elves under the label of "Atheist" just to get going so that they are not considered directionless floating boats in thought world.

Twitter profile for latest news and articles

https://twitter.com/DrNailaHussain

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

Latin Americans be careful of Islamic trap - Latino Americanos; tener cuidado con la trampa islámica

One of the many ways to prepare new activists from Latin America. They usually trap innocent victims. The messages in Spanish from victims show that they are naive and want to work in "aggressive" ways

Una de las muchas maneras de preparar nuevos activistas de América Latina. Por lo general, trampa de víctimas inocentes. Los mensajes en español de las víctimas; muestran que son ingenuos y quieren trabajar de manera "agresiva"



https://www.facebook.com/IslamEnSpanish/

Is polygamy real? How many women a Muslim male can have?

A so called religion's purpose is to connect with God but Islam does anything but that. Instead it teaches men to abuse children, women  and encourages slavery and above all treat them in the most inhuman way possible. Obviously social pictures of a few rich and famous show bejewelled women who look very lavish but the reality is very very different inside the veil.

Majority of Muslim women, as much as 89% suffer more than any other women born under any other social system or so called religious faith.  On surface and text books, news media and public statements talk of great love and peace and nobility towards women. However the reality is that women are considered like 2nd hand shoes once worn and can be thrown or just placed in a shoe box as the man pleases. All these so called "religious" pretexts"  and excuses that are published and quoted 24 hours by Islamic clergy and men is an entire bullshit that does not do anything but serves their nefarious purposes of abusing women in any way they can.

The face shown to the world is one of shyful niqabs and Purdah etc. and happy bunch of giggling women herded by long bearded men. However what is the ground reality?
The reality is that most Muslim women are coerced, violated, forced, raped and treated worse than enslaved women. As long as she is young and attractive she has a little value but once she is slightly old or has a child etc. or sick, men discards her as if she was a dead fly.
Muslim women have no real rights at all. The whole show that is shown to the world is a farce and a ridiculous public relation exercise, going on for past almost 13 centuries.

Polygamy

Does Islam permit a man to have more than one wife?
Yes. A Muslim man can marry as many as four women and have sexual relations with an unspecified number of slaves as well. Muhammad had eleven wives at one time.
Quran
Quran (4:3) - "Marry of the women, who seem good to you, two or three or four; and if ye fear that ye cannot do justice (to so many) then one (only) or (the captives) that your right hands possess." This verse plainly allows a man to have up to four wives (Allah conveniently granted Muhammad an exception... on the authority of Muhammad, of course). According to the Hadith, the "justice" spoken of merely refers to the dowry provided the bride, not the treatment accorded following the wedding.
Quran (4:129) - "Ye are never able to be fair and just as between women, even if it is your ardent desire" Underscores that a man is not able to treat multiple wives fairly. He would therefore be unable to acquire more than one wife if this were a requirement - which it is not. In fact, Muhammad was not able to treat his own wives fairly (see Additional Notes).
Quran (66:5) - "Maybe, his Lord, if he divorce you, will give him in your place wives better than you, submissive, faithful, obedient, penitent, adorers, fasters, widows and virgins" A disobedient wife can be replaced. A man can only have up to four wives, but he can rotate as many women as he pleases in and out of the lineup.


Hadith and Sira
Bukhari (62:2) - Provides the context for verse 4:3 of the Quran. "Dealing justly" is defined within a financial context. It refers to providing a fair dowry to secure marriage - not to the equal or fair treatment of wives (which is impossible according to verse 4:129).
Bukhari (5:268) - "The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number." I asked Anas, "Had the Prophet the strength for it?" Anas replied, "We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty men." Muhammad had a "special rule" that allowed him to have at least eleven wives. (His successors had more than four wives at a time as well.)
Bukhari (62:6) - "The Prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives."
Bukhari (77:598) - "Allah's Apostle said, "No woman should ask for the divorce of her sister (Muslim) so as to take her place, but she should marry the man (without compelling him to divorce his other wife)" Polygamy is firmly established in the Islamic tradition.
Notes
The practice of polygamy is a mathematical contradiction of the principle that men and women are to be treated equally. The Quran's allowance of multiple wives is therefore somewhat of a challenge to the contemporary apologist, who wants his Western audience to believe that Islam encourages gender equality. Often, the first ploy is a weak claim that Islam is the only religion to encourage monogamy - based on the snippet of verse 4:3 which says "marry only one."
In fact, this is not true. In the first place, the New Testament plainly states that the model Christian is the "husband of but one woman" to whom he should be faithful (ie. no exception for sex slaves, as the Quran allows). Secondly, the very Quranic verse from which the fragment "marry only one" is pulled is actually the very one that goes on to say that up to four wives are allowed as long as they "seem good" to the man!
At this point, the apologist usually falls back on defending polygamy itself - claiming that it reduces prostitution, for example - while effectively conceding that are not equal in Islam. After all, why would Allah procreate women and men at an equal rate if marriages were meant to have ratios as high as 4:1? The Quran also gives devout Muslim men license to capture women and use them as sex slaves, lest four wives prove insufficient.

A preacher in 'moderate' Tunisa recently claimed that is every Muslim man's divine right "to take a concubine along with his wife and to enjoy the ones that their right hands possess." He went to add that "the concubine is the most effective solution to restore the social and moral balance of society."
Nowhere does the Quran allow an existing wife (or wives) any veto power in her husband's choice of additional sexual partners. In fact, it discourages it by twice presenting an episode from Muhammad's live in which his wives "angered Allah" with their jealousy. (Allah took a remarkable interest in Muhammad's life, devoting passages from the eternal Quran to his personal comfort).
The prophet of Islam had many wives (nine of whom outlived him) and the bickering in this unhappy arrangement is well-chronicled. At one point, his wives were so upset by Muhammad's taking a slave girl to one of their own bedrooms that Allah had to step in and whisper parts of suras 33 and 66 in his ear, including the threat to divorce them all if they didn't allow him complete sexual freedom.
There are worse things in the world than polygamy (which has been practiced by many cultures outside of Islam), but it is shocking to see a religion place such high value on a man's base sexual desire that he is permitted to bring other women into the marriage bed just to satisfy his lust. As pointed out, women are not allowed the same freedom to seek sexual satisfaction from alternate sources should their husband lose interest or capacity.
The Western world has decided that polygamy devalues a woman's worth. In Islam, however, a woman's worth is often the sum of her sexual value to her husband.

Muslim men have license to beat or turture their slaves, wifes and any woman they employ

Some contemporary Muslim apologists often squirm over this relatively straightforward verse from the Quran (4:34) - which gives men the right to beat their wives if they even have a "fear" of disloyalty or disobedience.  Their rhetorical aerobics inspired us to write a separate article:
 
Wife Beating Good Enough for Muhammad, Good Enough for You
 
 Others are not nearly as squeamish.  Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradhawi, one of the most respected Muslim clerics in the world, once made the famous (and somewhat ridiculous statement) that "It is forbidden to beat the woman, unless it is necessary."  He went on to say that  "one may beat only to safeguard Islamic behavior," leaving no doubt that wife-beating is a matter of religious sanction.
 
 Dr. Muzammil Saddiqi, the former president of ISNA (the Islamic Society of North America), a mainstream Muslim organization, says it is important that a wife "recognizes the authority of her husband in the house" and that he may use physical force if he is "sure it would improve the situation."  (source)
 
 Sheikh Dr. Ahmad Muhammad Ahmad Al-Tayyeb, the head of Al-Azhar, Sunni Islam's most prestigious institution says that "light beatings" and "punching" are part of a program to "reform the wife" (source). 
 
 Dr. Jamal Badawi endorses corporal punishment as  "another measure that may save the marriage" (source).   He isn't clear on how striking a woman will make her more inclined toward staying with her assailant, unless the implication is fear of more serious consequences if she leaves.
 
 Egyptian cleric, Abd al-Rahman Mansour, said in a 2012 televised broadcast that, in addition to discouraging the wife from filing divorce, beatings would inspire the wife to "treat him with kindness and respect, and know that her husband has a higher status than her."
 
 During Ramadan of 2010, another cleric named Sa'd Arafat actually said the woman is "honored" by the beating (source).  No one else seemed terribly surprised or upset by this.
 
 An undercover report from progressive Sweden in 2012 found that 60% of mosques there actually advised beaten women not to report the abuse to the police.  These women were also told that they must submit to non-consensual 'sex' with their husbands. 
 
 In the birthplace of Islam, about half of Saudi women are beaten at home.  "Hands and sticks were found to be used mostly in beating women, following by men’s head cover and to a lesser extent, sharp objects." (source)
 In 2016, the Council of Islamic Ideology proposed a bill - ironically named the Protection of Women against Violence Act - that actually included exceptions for "lightly beating" defiant wives.  (source)
 
 According to Islamic law, a husband may strike his wife for any one of the following four reasons:

- She does not attempt to make herself beautiful for him (ie. "let's herself go")
 - She refuses to meet his sexual demands
 - She leaves the house without his permission or for a "legitimate reason"
 - She neglects her religious duties

Any of these are also sufficient grounds for divorce.
 
 Respected Quran scholars in the past interpreted verse 4:34 with impressive candor.  Tabari said that it means to "admonish them, but if they refused to repent, then tie them up in their homes and beat them until they obey Allah’s commands toward you."  Qurtubi told wife-beaters to avoid breaking bones, if possible, but added that "it is not a crime if it leads to death."
 
 Muslim apologists sometimes say that Muhammad ordered that women not be harmed, but they are actually basing this on what he said before or during a battle, such as in  Bukhari (59:447), when Muhammad issued a command for all the men of Quraiza be killed and the women and children taken as slaves.  (Having your husband murdered and being forced into sexual slavery apparently doesn't qualify as "harm" under the Islamic model).
 
 But, in fact, there are a number of cases in which Muhammad did have women killed in the most brutal fashion.  One was Asma bint Marwan, a mother or five, who wrote a poem criticizing the Medinans for accepting Muhammad after he had ordered the murder of an elderly man.  In this case, the prophet's assassins literally pulled a sleeping infant from her breast and stabbed her to death.
 
 After taking Mecca in 630, Muhammad also ordered the murder of a slave girl who had merely made up songs mocking him.  The Hadith are rife with accounts of women planted in the ground on Muhammad's command and pelted to death with stones for sexual immorality - yet the prophet of Islam actually encouraged his own men to rape women captured in battle (Abu Dawood 2150, Muslim  3433) and did not punish them for killing non-Muslim women (as Khalid ibn Walid did on several occasions - see Ibn Ishaq 838 and 856).
 
 In summary, according to the Qur'an, Hadith and Islamic law, a woman may indeed have physical harm done to her if the circumstances warrant, with one such allowance being in the case of disobedience.  This certainly does not mean that all Muslim men beat their wives, only that Islam permits them to do so.

Female slaves, Wives beating - explicit so called Religious texts


               Quran
Quran (4:34) - "Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great."  Contemporary translations sometimes water down the word 'beat', but it is the same one used in verse  8:12 and clearly means 'to strike'.
Quran (38:44) - "And take in your hand a green branch and beat her with it, and do not break your oath..."  Allah telling Job to beat his wife (Tafsir).
 

Hadith and Sira
Bukhari (72:715) - A woman came to Muhammad and begged her to stop her husband from beating her. Her skin was bruised so badly that it is described as being "greener" than the green veil she was wearing. Muhammad did not admonish her husband, but instead ordered her to return to him and submit to his sexual desires.

 Bukhari (72:715) - "Aisha said, 'I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women'" Muhammad's own wife complained of the abuse that the women of her religion suffered relative to other women.

 Muslim (4:2127) - Muhammad struck his favorite wife, Aisha, in the chest one evening when she left the house without his permission. Aisha narrates,  "He struck me on the chest which caused me pain."

 Muslim (9:3506) - Muhammad's fathers-in-law (Abu Bakr and Umar) amused him by slapping his wives (Aisha and Hafsa) for annoying him. According to the Hadith, the prophet of Islam laughed upon hearing this.

 Abu Dawud (2141) - "Iyas bin ‘Abd Allah bin Abi Dhubab reported the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) as saying: Do not beat Allah’s handmaidens, but when ‘Umar came to the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) and said: Women have become emboldened towards their husbands, he (the Prophet) gave permission to beat them." At first, Muhammad forbade men from beating their wives, but he rescinded this once it was reported that women were becoming emboldened toward their husbands. Beatings in a Muslim marriage are sometimes necessary to keep women in their place.

 Abu Dawud (2142) - "The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife."

Abu Dawud (2126) -  "A man from the Ansar called Basrah said: 'I married a virgin woman in her veil. When I entered upon her, I found her pregnant. (I mentioned this to the Prophet).' The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: 'She will get the dower, for you made her vagina lawful for you. The child will be your slave. When she has begotten (a child), flog her'" A Muslim thinks he is getting a virgin, then finds out that she is pregnant. Muhammad tells him to treat the woman as a sex slave and then flog her after she delivers the child.

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 969 - Requires that a married woman be  "put in a separate room and beaten lightly" if she "act in a sexual manner toward others." According to the Hadith, this can be for an offense as petty as merely being alone with a man to whom she is not related.

Kash-shaf (the revealer) of al-Zamkhshari (Vol. 1, p. 525) - [Muhammad said] "Hang up your scourge where your wife can see it"


                Does Islam allow a man to hit his wife?

Yes, but only if she doesn't do as he asks. The beating must stop if the woman complies with her husband's demands. Behind verbal abuse and abandonment, beating is intended as last resort solution to coerce submission.
According her testimony in the Hadith, Muhammad physically struck his favorite wife for leaving the house without his permission. It is not known how he treated his less-favored wives.

Islam Respects Women as Equals is perhaps the most literary mask ever created to hide an ugly truth.

 

 
 
Quran says that men and women will be judged by Allah.  This does not mean that they have equal rights and roles, or that they are judged by the same standards.

There is no ambiguity in the Quran, the life of Muhammad, or Islamic law as to the inferiority of women to men, despite the effort of modern-day apologists to salvage Western-style feminism from scraps and fragments of verses that have historically yielded no such progressive interpretation.

After military conquests, Muhammad would dole out captured women as war booties or prizes to his men.  In at least one case, he advocated that they be raped in front of their husbands.  Captured women were made into sex slaves by the very men who killed their husbands and brothers.  There are four Quranic verses in which "Allah" makes clear that a Muslim master has full sexual access to his female slaves, yet there is not one that prohibits rape.

The Quran gives Muslim men permission to beat their wives for disobedience, but nowhere does it command love in marriage (although it does say that "love" exists).  The verses plainly say that husbands are “a degree above” their wives.  The Hadith says that women are intellectually inferior, and that they comprise the majority of Hell’s occupants.

Under Islamic law, a man may divorce his wife at his choosing.  If he does this twice, then wishes to remarry her, she must first have sex with another man.  Men are exempt from such degradations.

Muslim women are not free to marry whom they please as Muslim men are.  Their husband may also bring other wives (and slaves) into the marriage bed.  And she must be sexually available to him at any time (as a field ready to be “tilled,” according to the holy book of Islam).

Muslim women do not inherit property in equal portion to males.  This is somewhat ironic given that Islam owes its existence to the wealth of Muhammad's first wife, which would not otherwise have been inherited by her given that she had two brothers and her first husband had three sons.

A woman's testimony in court is considered to be worth only half that of a man’s, according to the Quran.  Unlike a man, she must also cover her head - and often her face.

If a woman wants to prove that she was raped, then there must be four male witnesses to corroborate her account (according to strict Sharia).  Otherwise she can be jailed or stoned to death for confessing to “adultery.”

Given all of this, it is quite a stretch to say that men and women have “equality under Islam” based on obscure theological analogies or comparisons.  This is an entirely new ploy that is designed for modern tastes and disagrees sharply with the reality of Islamic law and history.