Thursday, November 17, 2016

Why does Pakistan seek a War with India? The answer lies in the Islamic doctrine of 'Ghazwa-e-Hind'

Indian politicians and academics as well a men and women of the military have remained confounded at what they see as the irrational urge among Pakistan's Military-Mullah Establishment to provoke a war with India despite repeated defeats in 1947-48, 1965, 1971, and 1999.

The answer may be in this 2011 lecture by a prominent Islamic cleric and former banker Irfan-ul-Haq as he explains the genesis of Pakistan being the prophesied defeat of India and Hinduism at the hands of Pakistan in what is known in the Hadith (Hadees) literature as the 'Ghazwa-e-Hind' or the Prophet's War on India.

The cleric tells his enthralled audience that Pakistan came about for the sole purpose of being the springboard of the end-of-times 'Ghazwa-e-Hind' when Pakistan's military and people will swarm India and wipe out once and for all the practice of Hinduism from the face of earth.

He says, only then will the armies of Islam march to meet the reincarnation of Jesus Christ in Syria from where Europe will be conquered and once that is done, human civilization will end on the prophesized day of Qayamat (Qayama in Arabic, the end of times

Pakistani Mullah offers Sex Service to Divorced Woman on Live TV HALALA an Islamic way to abuse women

“I came to the absolute conviction that it is impossible…impossible…for any human being to read the biography of Mohammed and believe in it, and then emerge a psychologically and mentally healthy person.”

- Syrian Psychiatrist Dr. Wafa Sultan
Pakistani Mullah offers Sex Service to Divorced Woman on Live TV
This discussion on Live TV on a Pakistani Network provides insight into one of the darkest aspects of Islamic Sharia as it pertains to Women, Family Law, Divorce and the Islamic Clergy.

According to Islamic Sharia, if a husband divorces his wife and utters the word 'Talaak' (I divorce you) three consecutive times, the woman stands divorced in the eyes of Islamic law.

However, if the divorced couple wishes to re-marry, they cannot unless the woman marries another man first, has sexual intercourse with this new husband and he then divorces her.

Of course, this is next to impossible. So here come the services of the Mullah, Imam or the mosque cleric.

Throughout Islamic history, Imams and Mullahs have offered their 'services' whereby they marry the divorced woman for a few days, rape her during this time and then divorce her so that she can get back with her original husband.

In the TV discussion, not one but two such clerics unashamedly 'offer their services' to the divorced woman. Sad and hilarious to see Muslim men and woman agree to such sexual exploitation. But who can we blame when Islam and Sharia permits such rape and sanctifies it as a pre-condition to a divorced husband and wife coming together.

Is "GOD" exclusive for one community of "FAITH" ? Is anyone Infidel?



 All nature, elements and the energy is universal.
Man made ideas, religions, faiths that proclaim they have exclusive rights to "GOD" are defective and must reform or perish.
You can not control the element of fire, it will burn a Muslim, Christian or a Hindu or Buddhist with exactly the same intensity. You can not control water it will give you life if you keep it clean but will kill human life if toxic. Water element is also universal and Muslims or Christians can not control or claim exclusivity. Air similarly is universal and no man, group, community or faith can claim or control it. Earth is for all beings humans and non human living beings and anyone claiming it is for Muslims or Christians or all human and animal beings are controlled by their "GOD" is brain damaged and must be checked for sanity. However Islamists claim that they must control all beings of this planet. The energy source and energy itself is also universal and NO Christian or Muslim or can claim ownership. Likewise "GODS powers" are for every single being on this planet, living humans or animals or other life species.
NOBODY IS without energy. Source of all energy is one. No living being is closer or far from this source. Likewise all living beings are faithful or fidel to GODS powers and the natural elements.
Infidel (literally "unfaithful") is a pejorative term used in certain religions for those who do not believe the central tenets of one's own religion, are members of another religion, or are not religious.
Anyone claiming a special status of being called as FAITHFUL or Fidel and calling others infidel, unfaithful or Kafir is not only brain damaged, insane and foolish; but he is also engaging in the biggest blasphemic act and will be punished for breaking and disrespecting universal laws for his wrongful ideas and propagation of these false ideas. If you are a real Christian or Muslim STOP PEOPLE OF YOUR FAITH TO use label of Infidel or Kaafir from now. Those who call others unfaithful can never ever be faithful to ANY GOD.
IF you agree Please share and ask all friends to share it. STOP THE false propagation of Islamic propaganda of calling others INFIDEL as every human being is equal in eyes of energy that runs this universe.

Kashmir of India has been mutilated by Pakistan & a vicious Islam

Since 1948 Pakistan as a policy of grab more territory from India has engaged in a horrible war with India and the victims are people of India and specially Kashmir. Entire Hindu Kashmiri population in a so called majority Muslim area had to move after murders and rapes, plundering - a hall mark of Islam.
Pakistan has done every single act to terrorize, to destroy life, to completely block Kashmiris growth by literally killing their industries, businesses and lives. Kashmiri Muslims are some of the most gullible and continue to be foolishly be influenced by the Pakistani Evil Propaganda war and continue to stab in the back of their own citizens and India has to bear a heavy economic cost to pay all for these Muslims but as usual Muslims want to live free lives and they consider Hindus as Infidel and believe that any money from them is zizya tax and halaal or religiously valid.
 
Kashmir is not only a victim of Pakistan but Islam.
 

What the Islamic Invaders Did to India

by Rizwan Salim

On the anniversary of the Babri Masjid demolition (December 6, 1992), it is important for Hindus (and Muslims) to understand the importance of the event in the context of Hindustan's history, past and recent, present and the future.
Savages at a very low level of civilisation and no culture worth the name, from Arabia and west Asia, began entering India from the early century onwards. Islamic invaders demolished countless Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculpture and idols, plundered innumerable palaces and forts of Hindu kings, killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women. This story, the educated-and a lot of even the illiterate Indians-know very well. History books tell it in remarkable detail. But many Indians do not seem to recognise that the alien Muslim marauders destroyed the historical evolution of the earth's most mentally advanced civilisation, the most richly imaginative culture, and the most vigorously creative society.
It is clear that India at the time when Muslim invaders turned towards it (8 to 11th century) was the earth's richest region for its wealth in precious and semi-precious stones, gold and silver, religion and culture, and its fine arts and letters. Tenth century Hindustan was also too far advanced than its contemporaries in the East and the West for its achievements in the realms of speculative philosophy and scientific theorising, mathematics and knowledge of nature's workings. Hindus of the early medieval period were unquestionably superior in more things than the Chinese, the Persians (including the Sassanians), the Romans and the Byzantines of the immediate proceeding centuries. The followers of Siva and Vishnu on this subcontinent had created for themselves a society more mentally evolved-joyous and prosperous too-than had been realised by the Jews, Christians, and Muslim monotheists of the time. Medieval India, until the Islamic invaders destroyed it, was history's most richly imaginative culture and one of the five most advanced civilisations of all times.
Look at the Hindu art that Muslim iconoclasts severely damaged or destroyed. Ancient Hindu sculpture is vigorous and sensual in the highest degree-more fascinating than human figural art created anywhere else on earth. (Only statues created by classical Greek artists are in the same class as Hindu temple sculpture). Ancient Hindu temple architecture is the most awe-inspiring, ornate and spell-binding architectural style found anywhere in the world. (The Gothic art of cathedrals in France is the only other religious architecture that is comparable with the intricate architecture of Hindu temples). No artist of any historical civilisation have ever revealed the same genius as ancient Hindustan's artists and artisans.
Their minds filled with venom against the idol-worshippers of Hindustan, the Muslims destroyed a large number of ancient Hindu temples. This is a historical fact, mentioned by Muslim chroniclers and others of the time. A number of temples were merely damaged and remained standing. But a large number-not hundreds but many thousands-of the ancient temples were broken into shreds of cracked stone. In the ancient cities of Varanasi and Mathura, Ujjain and Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi and Dwarka, not one temple survives whole and intact from the ancient times.
The wrecking of Hindu temples went on from the early years of the 8th century to well past 1700 AD a period of almost 1000 years. Every Muslim ruler in Delhi (or Governor of Provinces) spent most of his time warring against Hindu kings in the north and the south, the east and the west, and almost every Muslim Sultan and his army commanders indulged in largescale destructions of Hindu temples and idols. They also slaughtered a lot of Hindus. It is easy to conclude that virtually every Hindu temple built in the ancient times is a perfect work of art. The evidence of the ferocity with which the Muslim invaders must have struck at the sculptures of gods and goddesses, demons and apsaras, kings and queens, dancers and musicians is frightful. At so many ancient temples of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, for example, shattered portions of stone images still lie scattered in the temple courtyards. Considering the fury used on the idols and sculptures, the stone-breaking axe must have been applied to thousands upon thousands of images of hypnotic beauty.
Giving proof of the resentment that men belonging to an inferior civilisation feel upon encountering a superior civilisation of individuals with a more refined culture, Islamic invaders from Arabia and western Asia broke and burned everything beautiful they came across in Hindustan. So morally degenerate were the Muslim Sultans that, rather than attract Hindu "infidels" to Islam through force of personal example and exhortation, they just built a number of mosques at the sites of torn down temples-and foolishly pretended they had triumphed over the minds and culture of the Hindus. I have seen stones and columns of Hindu temples incorportated into the architecture of several mosques, including the Jama Masjid and Ahmed Shah Masjid in Ahmedabad; the mosque in the Uparkot fort of Junagadh (Gujarat) and in Vidisha (near Bhopal); the Adhai Din Ka Jhonpra right next to the famous dargah in Ajmer-and the currently controversial Bhojshala "mosque" in Dhar (near Indore). Hindu culture was at its imaginative best and vigorously creative when the severely-allergic-to-images Muslims entered Hindustan. Islamic invaders did not just destroy countless temples and constructions but also suppressed cultural and religious practices; damaged the pristine vigour of Hindu religion, prevented the intensification of Hindu culture, debilitating it permanently, stopped the development of Hindu arts ended the creative impulse in all realms of thought and action, damaged the people's cultural pride, disrupted the transmission of values and wisdom, cultural practices and tradition from one generation to the next; destroyed the proper historical evolution of Hindu kingdoms and society, affected severely the acquisition of knowledge, research and reflection and violated the moral basis of Hindu society. The Hindus suffered immense psychic damage. The Muslims also plundered the wealth of the Hindu kingdoms, impoverished the Hindu populace, and destroyed the prosperity of Hindustan.
Gaze in wonder at the Kailas Mandir in the Ellora caves and remember that it is carved out of a solid stone hill, an effort that (inscriptions say) took nearly 200 years. This is art as devotion. The temple built by the Rashtrakuta kings (who also built the colossal sculpture in the Elenhanta caves off Mumbai harbour) gives proof of the ancient Hindus' religious fervor.
But the Kailas temple also indicated a will power, a creative imagination, and an intellect eager to take on the greatest of artistic challenges.
The descendants of those who built the magnificent temples of Bhojpur and Thanjavur, Konark and Kailas, invented mathematics and brain surgery, created mindbody disciplines (yoga) of astonishing power, and built mighty empires would almost certainly have attained technological superiority over Europe.
It is not just for "political reasons" that Hindus want to build grand temples at the sites of the (wrecked) Babri Masjid in Ayodhya, the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, and the Mathura idgah. The efforts of religion-intoxicated and politically active Hindus to rebuild the Ram Mandir, the Kashi Vishwanath Mandir, and the Krishna Mandir are just three episodes m a one-thousand year long Hindu struggle to reclaim their culture and religion from alien invaders.
The demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on 6 December 1992 was just one episode in the millennial struggle of the Hindus to repossess their religion-centered culture and nation. Meanwhile, hundreds of ancient Hindu temples forsaken all over Hindustan await the reawakening of Hindu cultural pride to be repaired or rebuilt and restored to their original, ancient glory.

Rizwan Salim is a reviewer of New York Tribune, Capitol Hill reporter,  assistant editor of American Sentinel.