Thursday, November 17, 2016

Why does Pakistan seek a War with India? The answer lies in the Islamic doctrine of 'Ghazwa-e-Hind'

Indian politicians and academics as well a men and women of the military have remained confounded at what they see as the irrational urge among Pakistan's Military-Mullah Establishment to provoke a war with India despite repeated defeats in 1947-48, 1965, 1971, and 1999.

The answer may be in this 2011 lecture by a prominent Islamic cleric and former banker Irfan-ul-Haq as he explains the genesis of Pakistan being the prophesied defeat of India and Hinduism at the hands of Pakistan in what is known in the Hadith (Hadees) literature as the 'Ghazwa-e-Hind' or the Prophet's War on India.

The cleric tells his enthralled audience that Pakistan came about for the sole purpose of being the springboard of the end-of-times 'Ghazwa-e-Hind' when Pakistan's military and people will swarm India and wipe out once and for all the practice of Hinduism from the face of earth.

He says, only then will the armies of Islam march to meet the reincarnation of Jesus Christ in Syria from where Europe will be conquered and once that is done, human civilization will end on the prophesized day of Qayamat (Qayama in Arabic, the end of times

Pakistani Mullah offers Sex Service to Divorced Woman on Live TV HALALA an Islamic way to abuse women

“I came to the absolute conviction that it is impossible…impossible…for any human being to read the biography of Mohammed and believe in it, and then emerge a psychologically and mentally healthy person.”

- Syrian Psychiatrist Dr. Wafa Sultan
Pakistani Mullah offers Sex Service to Divorced Woman on Live TV
This discussion on Live TV on a Pakistani Network provides insight into one of the darkest aspects of Islamic Sharia as it pertains to Women, Family Law, Divorce and the Islamic Clergy.

According to Islamic Sharia, if a husband divorces his wife and utters the word 'Talaak' (I divorce you) three consecutive times, the woman stands divorced in the eyes of Islamic law.

However, if the divorced couple wishes to re-marry, they cannot unless the woman marries another man first, has sexual intercourse with this new husband and he then divorces her.

Of course, this is next to impossible. So here come the services of the Mullah, Imam or the mosque cleric.

Throughout Islamic history, Imams and Mullahs have offered their 'services' whereby they marry the divorced woman for a few days, rape her during this time and then divorce her so that she can get back with her original husband.

In the TV discussion, not one but two such clerics unashamedly 'offer their services' to the divorced woman. Sad and hilarious to see Muslim men and woman agree to such sexual exploitation. But who can we blame when Islam and Sharia permits such rape and sanctifies it as a pre-condition to a divorced husband and wife coming together.

Is "GOD" exclusive for one community of "FAITH" ? Is anyone Infidel?



 All nature, elements and the energy is universal.
Man made ideas, religions, faiths that proclaim they have exclusive rights to "GOD" are defective and must reform or perish.
You can not control the element of fire, it will burn a Muslim, Christian or a Hindu or Buddhist with exactly the same intensity. You can not control water it will give you life if you keep it clean but will kill human life if toxic. Water element is also universal and Muslims or Christians can not control or claim exclusivity. Air similarly is universal and no man, group, community or faith can claim or control it. Earth is for all beings humans and non human living beings and anyone claiming it is for Muslims or Christians or all human and animal beings are controlled by their "GOD" is brain damaged and must be checked for sanity. However Islamists claim that they must control all beings of this planet. The energy source and energy itself is also universal and NO Christian or Muslim or can claim ownership. Likewise "GODS powers" are for every single being on this planet, living humans or animals or other life species.
NOBODY IS without energy. Source of all energy is one. No living being is closer or far from this source. Likewise all living beings are faithful or fidel to GODS powers and the natural elements.
Infidel (literally "unfaithful") is a pejorative term used in certain religions for those who do not believe the central tenets of one's own religion, are members of another religion, or are not religious.
Anyone claiming a special status of being called as FAITHFUL or Fidel and calling others infidel, unfaithful or Kafir is not only brain damaged, insane and foolish; but he is also engaging in the biggest blasphemic act and will be punished for breaking and disrespecting universal laws for his wrongful ideas and propagation of these false ideas. If you are a real Christian or Muslim STOP PEOPLE OF YOUR FAITH TO use label of Infidel or Kaafir from now. Those who call others unfaithful can never ever be faithful to ANY GOD.
IF you agree Please share and ask all friends to share it. STOP THE false propagation of Islamic propaganda of calling others INFIDEL as every human being is equal in eyes of energy that runs this universe.

Kashmir of India has been mutilated by Pakistan & a vicious Islam

Since 1948 Pakistan as a policy of grab more territory from India has engaged in a horrible war with India and the victims are people of India and specially Kashmir. Entire Hindu Kashmiri population in a so called majority Muslim area had to move after murders and rapes, plundering - a hall mark of Islam.
Pakistan has done every single act to terrorize, to destroy life, to completely block Kashmiris growth by literally killing their industries, businesses and lives. Kashmiri Muslims are some of the most gullible and continue to be foolishly be influenced by the Pakistani Evil Propaganda war and continue to stab in the back of their own citizens and India has to bear a heavy economic cost to pay all for these Muslims but as usual Muslims want to live free lives and they consider Hindus as Infidel and believe that any money from them is zizya tax and halaal or religiously valid.
 
Kashmir is not only a victim of Pakistan but Islam.
 

What the Islamic Invaders Did to India

by Rizwan Salim

On the anniversary of the Babri Masjid demolition (December 6, 1992), it is important for Hindus (and Muslims) to understand the importance of the event in the context of Hindustan's history, past and recent, present and the future.
Savages at a very low level of civilisation and no culture worth the name, from Arabia and west Asia, began entering India from the early century onwards. Islamic invaders demolished countless Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculpture and idols, plundered innumerable palaces and forts of Hindu kings, killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women. This story, the educated-and a lot of even the illiterate Indians-know very well. History books tell it in remarkable detail. But many Indians do not seem to recognise that the alien Muslim marauders destroyed the historical evolution of the earth's most mentally advanced civilisation, the most richly imaginative culture, and the most vigorously creative society.
It is clear that India at the time when Muslim invaders turned towards it (8 to 11th century) was the earth's richest region for its wealth in precious and semi-precious stones, gold and silver, religion and culture, and its fine arts and letters. Tenth century Hindustan was also too far advanced than its contemporaries in the East and the West for its achievements in the realms of speculative philosophy and scientific theorising, mathematics and knowledge of nature's workings. Hindus of the early medieval period were unquestionably superior in more things than the Chinese, the Persians (including the Sassanians), the Romans and the Byzantines of the immediate proceeding centuries. The followers of Siva and Vishnu on this subcontinent had created for themselves a society more mentally evolved-joyous and prosperous too-than had been realised by the Jews, Christians, and Muslim monotheists of the time. Medieval India, until the Islamic invaders destroyed it, was history's most richly imaginative culture and one of the five most advanced civilisations of all times.
Look at the Hindu art that Muslim iconoclasts severely damaged or destroyed. Ancient Hindu sculpture is vigorous and sensual in the highest degree-more fascinating than human figural art created anywhere else on earth. (Only statues created by classical Greek artists are in the same class as Hindu temple sculpture). Ancient Hindu temple architecture is the most awe-inspiring, ornate and spell-binding architectural style found anywhere in the world. (The Gothic art of cathedrals in France is the only other religious architecture that is comparable with the intricate architecture of Hindu temples). No artist of any historical civilisation have ever revealed the same genius as ancient Hindustan's artists and artisans.
Their minds filled with venom against the idol-worshippers of Hindustan, the Muslims destroyed a large number of ancient Hindu temples. This is a historical fact, mentioned by Muslim chroniclers and others of the time. A number of temples were merely damaged and remained standing. But a large number-not hundreds but many thousands-of the ancient temples were broken into shreds of cracked stone. In the ancient cities of Varanasi and Mathura, Ujjain and Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi and Dwarka, not one temple survives whole and intact from the ancient times.
The wrecking of Hindu temples went on from the early years of the 8th century to well past 1700 AD a period of almost 1000 years. Every Muslim ruler in Delhi (or Governor of Provinces) spent most of his time warring against Hindu kings in the north and the south, the east and the west, and almost every Muslim Sultan and his army commanders indulged in largescale destructions of Hindu temples and idols. They also slaughtered a lot of Hindus. It is easy to conclude that virtually every Hindu temple built in the ancient times is a perfect work of art. The evidence of the ferocity with which the Muslim invaders must have struck at the sculptures of gods and goddesses, demons and apsaras, kings and queens, dancers and musicians is frightful. At so many ancient temples of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, for example, shattered portions of stone images still lie scattered in the temple courtyards. Considering the fury used on the idols and sculptures, the stone-breaking axe must have been applied to thousands upon thousands of images of hypnotic beauty.
Giving proof of the resentment that men belonging to an inferior civilisation feel upon encountering a superior civilisation of individuals with a more refined culture, Islamic invaders from Arabia and western Asia broke and burned everything beautiful they came across in Hindustan. So morally degenerate were the Muslim Sultans that, rather than attract Hindu "infidels" to Islam through force of personal example and exhortation, they just built a number of mosques at the sites of torn down temples-and foolishly pretended they had triumphed over the minds and culture of the Hindus. I have seen stones and columns of Hindu temples incorportated into the architecture of several mosques, including the Jama Masjid and Ahmed Shah Masjid in Ahmedabad; the mosque in the Uparkot fort of Junagadh (Gujarat) and in Vidisha (near Bhopal); the Adhai Din Ka Jhonpra right next to the famous dargah in Ajmer-and the currently controversial Bhojshala "mosque" in Dhar (near Indore). Hindu culture was at its imaginative best and vigorously creative when the severely-allergic-to-images Muslims entered Hindustan. Islamic invaders did not just destroy countless temples and constructions but also suppressed cultural and religious practices; damaged the pristine vigour of Hindu religion, prevented the intensification of Hindu culture, debilitating it permanently, stopped the development of Hindu arts ended the creative impulse in all realms of thought and action, damaged the people's cultural pride, disrupted the transmission of values and wisdom, cultural practices and tradition from one generation to the next; destroyed the proper historical evolution of Hindu kingdoms and society, affected severely the acquisition of knowledge, research and reflection and violated the moral basis of Hindu society. The Hindus suffered immense psychic damage. The Muslims also plundered the wealth of the Hindu kingdoms, impoverished the Hindu populace, and destroyed the prosperity of Hindustan.
Gaze in wonder at the Kailas Mandir in the Ellora caves and remember that it is carved out of a solid stone hill, an effort that (inscriptions say) took nearly 200 years. This is art as devotion. The temple built by the Rashtrakuta kings (who also built the colossal sculpture in the Elenhanta caves off Mumbai harbour) gives proof of the ancient Hindus' religious fervor.
But the Kailas temple also indicated a will power, a creative imagination, and an intellect eager to take on the greatest of artistic challenges.
The descendants of those who built the magnificent temples of Bhojpur and Thanjavur, Konark and Kailas, invented mathematics and brain surgery, created mindbody disciplines (yoga) of astonishing power, and built mighty empires would almost certainly have attained technological superiority over Europe.
It is not just for "political reasons" that Hindus want to build grand temples at the sites of the (wrecked) Babri Masjid in Ayodhya, the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, and the Mathura idgah. The efforts of religion-intoxicated and politically active Hindus to rebuild the Ram Mandir, the Kashi Vishwanath Mandir, and the Krishna Mandir are just three episodes m a one-thousand year long Hindu struggle to reclaim their culture and religion from alien invaders.
The demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on 6 December 1992 was just one episode in the millennial struggle of the Hindus to repossess their religion-centered culture and nation. Meanwhile, hundreds of ancient Hindu temples forsaken all over Hindustan await the reawakening of Hindu cultural pride to be repaired or rebuilt and restored to their original, ancient glory.

Rizwan Salim is a reviewer of New York Tribune, Capitol Hill reporter,  assistant editor of American Sentinel.

Thursday, October 27, 2016

It's All About Muhammad: A Biography of the World's Most Notorious Prophet

by F. W. Burleigh 
Why all the car bombs, beheadings, and mass murders in the Middle East? Why the relentless killing of non-Muslims throughout the world by the followers of Muhammad's religion? Why Boston, Paris, San Bernardino, Brussels, Orlando, and, Nice, and now . . . ?
Author F. W. Burleigh draws on an academic, investigative, and literary background to bring forth this penetrating look at what is behind it all. Burleigh’s interest in Islam was sparked by the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11. The question guiding his studies was, “Why is there so much violence connected with this religion?” After a line-by-line scrutiny of 20,000 pages of the original literature of Islam, the author gives his blunt assessment in the title: It’s All About Muhammad.
The book contains 25 stunningly bold illustrations and is divided into three parts: The Cave, The Twilight Zone, and Darkness at Noon. The first 12 chapters explore evidence that Muhammad experienced epileptic fits that convinced him he was in communion with God. They explain the Koran and why Muhammad composed it the way he did. They show the humble origin of the Kabah, which only attained its cubic shape in the year A.D. 605 with Muhammad as a member of the construction crew. These first chapters also expose the magma chamber of hatred that formed in him due to traumatic early-life experiences, and they track the emergence of what can be described as a psychopathic nature. His belief in himself as the "last and final messenger" led him finally to declare war on all people who refused to accept him and his religion.
In the second part, Muhammad's magma erupts on the world. The book shows the creation of his al-qaeda--his base of operations in Yathrib (Medina) where he fled after the Meccans decided they had to kill him; his conflict with the Jewish tribes of Yathrib after they refused to accept him as their prophet; his genocide of the Jews including the beheading of the men of an entire tribe; the assassination of his critics; the battles and raids and orgies of rape, plunder, and slaughter; and finally his conquest of Mecca. Like a dramatic arc, these 18 chapters form Act II of a script that is still being played out today.
In the final part, Muhammad's conquest of all of Arabia is presented. This section also gives an account of his numerous wives and the expansion of his wars beyond the confines of the Arabian Peninsula. One of the final chapters explores his claim that he will be the first to be resurrected on the day of resurrection and that he will assist God in determining who goes to heaven.
What Muhammad created continues to wreak havoc on the world, and that is because Muslims are obligated to follow the example of Muhammad—his sunna, which is where the Sunnis take their name. And his sunna includes the example of the violence he committed against people who rejected him.
It is not sufficient any longer merely to raise the alarm about Islam--an ideology of submission to the will of a psychologically deformed and spiritually bankrupt man. What needs to accompany the alarm is a solution, and this book offers a solution: It is a matter of an aggressive, relentless, and unapologetic exposure of the truth about Muhammad in every graphic form possible, from illustrated books to docudramas to full-length feature films. With its 25 illustrations, It's All About Muhammad offers itself as an example of the approach. The truth about Muhammad is a powerful weapon of self-defense that people must take up to oppose and ultimately push back what he created. The truth about him can bring an end to what he created, and it is a weapon within the reach of everyone.
FOR MORE ABOUT IT'S ALL ABOUT MUHAMMAD, VISIT: http://itsallaboutmuhammad.com/

Reviews :
By M
The author, after researching some 20,000 pages of documents, writes in great detail about what it was like in the Arabian Peninsula in the time of Muhammad. At times, I actually felt like I was there listening to this snake-oil salesman, or watching the reactions of the people he was ordering to be slaughtered like goats, or feeling what must have been felt by the women of these conquered tribes who had just watched in horror while their husbands, sons, brothers, and the male members of their families, were beheaded in front of their own eyes as they were rounded up to be taken to the slave markets, or distributed to his soldiers as “booty” – their rewards for their murdering rampages through these conquered communities.

Burleigh writes so the reader can almost enter the mind of Muhammad as he is “inventing” another verse from the lips of Gabriel, who of course, is merely repeating what God has told him to convey to his messenger. In actuality, these conversations were the inventions of Muhammad and acted out so as to bolster the "authenticity" of his verses....... that would live forever in the writings of the Qu'ran and be repeated by millions of "believers" in the centuries to come. At the time, his audience was composed of ignorant, superstitious, carnal desert dwellers whose power came from the swords they wielded. Easy to manipulate and eager to spill blood in return for a guarantee of entry to paradise and an eternal escape from the harsh environments in which they existed.

He describes how Muhammad would wash his hands, arms, and feet for his required “ablutions” before prayers, and like a mafia Don, before the world had even heard the word “Mafia,” allow his sycophantic followers to grovel around him and partake of that water as an “ointment” to rub on their skins, or to sip it as an elixir. Abu Sufyan, the leader of the hold outs in Mecca, after seeing this, realized that even he, who had at times led 10,000 warriors into battle, could not imagine even a single man in his army would have done the same for him.

Burleigh projects a psychologist’s view of what inspired Muhammad to believe he was God’s chosen “final” prophet. He says that Muhammad was a victim of epilepsy, what they called the “falling sickness,” in those days of ignorance. He suggests that Muhammad had visions that came to him while he was in the midst of these attacks and interpreted them as messages from an angel from God: Gabrielle, who spoke to him personally. Burleigh makes it sound like a reasonable, and believable, result of a medical phenomenon. I agree that perhaps it is a possible viewpoint into Muhammad’s illusion of conversations with Gabrielle, but as for the continuation after the early epileptic fits, I don’t buy it. After the early "recitations," it was pure meglomaniacal egotism and his murderous self-aggrandizement efforts at total control. Regardless, because of the absence of Muhammad’s medical records at the local medical clinic, what Burleigh projects is mere conjecture. But that’s just my opinion.

Browsing another website, I saw a post by some guy who said, "This is the most important book written in the past 100 years." I don't know about the "100 years," but without a doubt, this book is extremely important and very, very timely. Today we're seeing some of the most gruesome savagery that has ever confronted the modern civilized world, and it's being perpetrated in the name of God. Yes, there are historical precedents in medieval times by those of other religions, but today we're hearing explanations from supposedly informed sources as to the contemporary causes of it. Trouble is, that without the knowledge that comes from this and other books like it, you'll be completely incompetent to make a sound judgement of whether or not you're hearing the truth. Worse yet, you may be put in a position where you must cast a vote for or against someone who has expounded a position on this issue. Certainly, you'll be at sea without this background. And to be a really competent judge, you must read at least three books on this topic: The first should be "In This Arab Time" by Fouad Ajami (RIP). His book will give you a concise historical perspective on the politics of the entire middle east. The second book must be this one by Burleigh for an extensive and detailed history of Islam. Next, your third read must be, "Iran's Final Solution for Israel" by Andrew G. Bostom. Personally, I had trouble stopping there, and so will you. Nevertheless, have at it with Robert Spencer, Syed Salem Shahzad (RIP), Carlotta Gall and others. They'll give you the shade and color. Ultimately, there will be the question of the credibility or accuracy of Burleigh's book by its negative critics. After all the reading I've done on this topic, I say that there is a consistency among the writings and a responsibility reflected in the research and references by these authors, such that, even deducting a sizable amount for the inevitable exaggerations and biases of almost any human author, this stuff is dead-on credible. And to those who say, "Islam is peace," I say, let's hear it - that part of it - that's peace! I take it on faith that it must be there. And, hopefully, it's there to the extent and credibility as is the opposite in this book. Furthermore, I say that there is a profound mandate on any Muslim academic and cleric who so believes, to broadcast that peaceful part of it, loudly, clearly and credibly, far and wide - NOW! Otherwise, the truth about Islam will rest with Burleigh, Bostom, Spencer and others who tell it so convincingly, as they see it. I would give this book six stars, if I could.

About the Author

Nothing to do with Islam?: Investigating the West's Most Dangerous Blind Spot Paperback

Nothing to do with Islam?: Investigating the West's Most Dangerous Blind Spot                                
By PeterTownsend                                                                                                                                                                
One of the most depressing realities of modern life is the regularity with which deadly attacks are carried out in the name of Islam. Almost as depressing are the invariable reassurances by Western political leaders and media elites that these acts of violence had “nothing to do with Islam”. As part of these reassurances we will also regularly hear the terms Radical Islam, Islamism, Militant Islam, 'so-called' Islamic State (ISIS) and Jihadist bandied about as if people who act violently on behalf of Islam are somehow perverting the pristine teachings of the Muslim religion. Yet, niggling doubts remain. Why, if Islam is indeed a “religion of peace”, do these attacks keep coming? Why are the vast majority of acts of terror in our world today carried out by people steeped in the teachings of the Qur’an? With his new book, “Nothing to do with Islam”? - Investigating the West’s Most Dangerous Blind Spot, Peter Townsend (author of the highly acclaimed Questioning Islam - Tough Questions and Honest Answers about the Muslim Religion) examines the evidence as far as the possible link between Islam and violence is concerned. He does this by carefully analyzing the foundational texts of Islam (most notably the Qur’an and traditions), as well as the canonical set of stock responses whenever such a link is asserted. The question whether Islam promotes violence could very well be one of the most important questions ever faced by Western civilization. It deserves more attention and analysis than a few glib sound bites. Nothing to do with Islam? provides you with the opportunity to examine this question from all angles and come to your own conclusions.

Get this book at :
https://www.amazon.com/Nothing-Islam-Investigating-Wests-Dangerous/dp/1533336008/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1473144220&sr=8-1&keywords=nothing+to+do+with+islam

Nothing to do with Islam


Peter Townsend is a researcher into Islam based in Australia. His books include 'Questioning Islam' (An investigation into the truth-claims of Islam) and 'Nothing to do with Islam' (An exploration of the link between Islamic teaching and violence)

What is inside a drum?

What is hollow and deep makes a lot of sound. Big mass of people who know nothing and are blind followers of an idea are not necessarily good or useful to the rest of the humanity.

Islam is like a big drum that makes massive sound but inside there are only a few dead insects and a useless void.

The fake facade of man created Religions

A religion is a set of beliefs usually supported by a few literary sources that the promoters or sales people of that belief system forces the rest of the world to accept, some monstrous behead, if not agreeing and others ridicule and laugh at your form of worship out of their sheer arrogance and their so called Religiousness.
One has the right to live in assumptions and our own beliefs or beliefs of other generations just by taking it literally. We in effect do not need religions at all. We just need rational thinking, understanding better our world, physical and meta physical and beyond but creating an imaginary system of God, hell and heaven and then punish others because they do not believe in that system is fascism and more over stupidity. This stupidity and insanity has been carried on by at times thinking people merely for not having other recourse. Yet we all know the wrong will remain wrong and we can keep promoting a crooked dictator as pious devotee of "God" he trusts yet the evilness of that man will remain there and he and his soul will never get freed. A devilish spirited man can claim to be super religious but that is baseless fake claim not very different from the political leaders today who claim to have benevolence when their real purpose is to steal public resources. Religions are and have been always a super mechanism to control innocent people. Foolish follow, Smart just shrug but thinking people really know that it is all a bluff of 3rd rate. This last one is responsible for mayhem of religious fanatics.

Uniform Civil code is vital to save Indian Muslim women's constant abuse

India remains the only democratic land where so called converted Hindus into Islam, live in total peace and protection and yet are willing to be governed by the dark, shady, easily manipulatable, men centered "Islamic laws". Indian Muslim women are exploited, abused and used as third rate beings by Muslim men who are mostly non thinking, primitive minds whose mental growth stopped as soon as they or their forefathers converted into the controlled, dark group where thinking is not only prohibited but even persecuted specially for women who are considered non human beings.
The fact is, Most Indian Muslims do not appreciate the kindness, compassion and acceptance shown by good natured Hindu and Sikh & other faith population of India and instead of being grateful they stab them in the back and forever keep playing their games to make another Pakistan wherever they can in UP, Kerala, West Bengal, Kashmir or wherever they can, and for that they are engaging in secret meetings, distributing literature calling for converting India into another Muslim driven country and creating violence, mayhem and hatred. Muslims of India are told to live like primitive Arabs of 7th century and their conduct is pitiful and ridiculously arrogant. You can not talk to an Indian Mulsim without being abused, receive abusive words and the total lack of common sense portrays them as uneducated and different as they never try to unify under common institutions but seeking exclusve treatment and that includes special laws for them.
During my recent trips to Middle East One Egyptian "scholar" told me about Pakistani, Bengali and Hindi Muslims "These are subhuman slaves, without any thinking or thinking like faculty. Their main aim is to remain dramatically subjugated, abused and be used by Arab imperialistic joke and they will keep self destroying till the entire Arabia is back to full dust. These are most ignorant and dumb head people of the world without any knowledge or awareness of reality in any sense forget about Islamic principles or their meaning. The problem is for those who coexist with them."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skx7kbLLGd8

The Islamic view towards women - book theory is mere words reality is 1000 times harsher


The Islamic view towards women, the way ISIS leaders make sex-slaves out of captured women after war, the way Islamic rulers of conquered lands used to perform mass rapes after every conquest and maintain harems of thousands of infidel slave women; all this inhumanity can be traced down and understood by reviewing Quran and Hadiths.Here is a summary of what Islam has to offer to Muslim women:
a. Men can keep unto 4 wives and as many sex-slaves as they want. (Refer Quran Nisa 3)
Some Muslims defend this by saying that 4 wives are allowed only if one can do justice to all of them. This is a hoax. Because the role model for Muslims is Muhammad and even he could not do justice to 9/11/15/18 or whatever number of wives and innumerable concubines he kept, if we are to believe in Quran and Hadiths. Some Ayats were revealed only to settle the jealousy and feeling of injustice among his wives. So in essence, Muslim women are doomed to share their beds with other women, if their husbands so desire.
b. One cannot marry women who are already married. But if they are obtained after fight, even they are legal to be kept for lovemaking.
That is why all Muslim wars are followed by widespread rape and trading of women. (Refer Quran Nisa 24)
c. Quran states that one should not marry someone whom one’s father married or real sisters or milk-siblings. But it also states that what has happened is already happened.
To make this more clear, one should know that Quran considers Bible, Tauret and Zabur as previous messages from Allah. But none of these ever prohibit incest or close-kin marriages. In fact, these books are full of stories of incest. Hence Quran shamefully accepts Allah to have justified incest previously!


That is why some Imams of Sunni Islam like Abu Hanifa even justify intercourse with mother, sister and daughter!
d. Quran permits men to replace wives on condition that nothing given to the wife being replaced is taken back! (Refer Quran Nisa 20)
So this is open invitation for wife-swapping. What difference does Quran accord to women from cattle or shoes?
e. alaq is unilateral. Only husband can give Talaq. Women can request for Talaq but only husband has the final authority to give Talaq. Even Imam or Qazi cannot force a husband to give Talaq!
f. In case a husband gives Talaq to his wife in anger or due to some misconception, but later wants to repent, there is no option left.
Now he can have the woman as his wife only after the woman has married another man, lived with him for at least one month, has had intercourse with this new husband and then takes Talaq from this new husband!
Refer Bukhari and other Hadiths.
g. Quran considers Tauret to be a divine book. This divine book allows a husband to throw out his wife from his home if he does not like him. He simply needs to write a resignation letter and put in her hand!
But this book states that an ex-wife who had intercourse with a new husband cannot be accepted by the old husband. This contradicts Quran. Only Allah knows why he sent such sharply contradictory messages and what was the need to change his law to force women into prostitution?
h. Quran allows one to have intercourse with slaves. It suggests that one should not force them, but then states that even if one forces them for sex, Allah is forgiving!
i. As per Hadith, a woman has to come to bed as soon as her husband asks her to, no matter!
If you are a Muslim woman or plan to be a Muslim woman for sake of someone’s love, think twice before you jump into Hell or continue to live in Hell.

British streets look like Pakistan and Iraq

This is army without uniform and each of these wo/men is a soldier of a hidden force equal to 10 conventional soldiers and they will attack when no one expects. British and many other EU leaders must wake up as soon as possible before it is too late. The massive one weekend attack may shake EU cities so much there wont be any way to fix the losses. If leaders do not act people must wake up and get ready to defend. Analysts are dumb as they consider these intruders as hard core religious. Yes they are hard core but ready with full scale violence that no sane mind can ever think of. Violent Islam is the most insane dangerous force that will require massive defense and Nato style forces wont be able to outsmart it. The enemy is now hiding on every European street and it can not be worse. Ordinary police force wont be able to face the next guerilla war Syrian style that may be looming on horizon in next 3 semesters.British streets look like Pakistan and Iraq

Plundering of European cities - Mayors cant coop with aggressive invasion

Those cities of the world - where Islam is invading quietly or with noise - do not have any means to coop with the swarming refugees - and even if they do provide them shelter and food, none of these refugees want to work as they all, literally all of them want to be served and get a free life. Yes this is what is happening in Sweden, Germany and many other areas of Europe. Clintons plan a bigger islamic army all around Americas.

Abuse by migrants to Europe - European citizens social security funds being depleted to thugs

24 of Danish working population are going to finance each of their months salary to fund this "MIGRANT" with 3 wives and 20 kids. Expect 21 more kids by 2025 increasing the Danish population - More Jehadis - faster the integration of DANISH - into Islamic brother hood. Welcome to the new expansionist Islam where Europeans and Americans will be working to fund these free loaders

Havoc and Violence on European streets - hidden by Media

The chief of the German police union, "criminal migrants from North Africa are laughing at the German justice system as they are allowed to go free after committing crimes."
Settling the savage people driven by a violent idea of life, is a nightmarish utopia. The world peace is being ruined by these programmed mass migrations.
Chief Rainer Wendt expressed grave concern regarding the increasing number of migrant criminals, especially those of a North African origin. Unless the justice system changes no real action can be taken to solve migrant crime, reports Kronen Zeitung.
“They despise our country and laugh at our justice,” Mr. Wendt said and warned that the police cannot address migrant crime unless the justice system is willing to step up and deport repeated offenders.

He claims that officers in Germany are putting themselves at constant risk as many of the migrants are known to have a high level of violent behaviour and attack police who attempt to arrest them.
“If there is no pre-trial detention made, no imprisonment is imposed, and no deportations carried out then the police make multiple arrests and the perpetrators get away with it,” he said and maintained that the migrants end up back on the streets.
Mr. Wendt cited the “Casablanca Report” which documented some 2,244 North African migrant criminals in the city of Dusseldorf. According to the police union chief, the numbers for other major German cities are similar and he said that the migrant crisis has only served to reinforce numbers in the already-existing migrant criminal gangs.
Last year, Mr. Wendt made a similar statement at the height of the migrant crisis. “They don’t respect our law,” he said and asked why “things always have to go up in flames” before politicians “react”.
Development Minister Gerd Müller of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU),

Islam hides Pre Islamic Arabia [The Age of Ignorance or al-jahiliyya ] history?

Although sometimes used synonymously, the phrase “pre-Islamic Arabia” and the Arabic al-jahiliyya have different connotations. The English phrase implies only a temporal relationship to Islam. The Arabic expression (meaning literally “the age or condition of ignorance”), on the other hand, indicates an evaluation of selected parts of earlier Arabian history from a strongly Islamic perspective. The idea of the Jahiliyya is a construct of Islamic thinkers, developed for particular purposes. It ignores much of great interest for modern scholarship on the Arabs and Arabia and focuses on the immediate background of Islam, the life of the Arabs of western central Arabia (the Hijaz) in the century or so up to and including the early career of the prophet Muhammad.
In the 6th and 7th centuries A.D. a wave of effecting a complete break with the past spread over West Asia. All links with the past were broken, images smashed, scriptures destroyed, education discontinued and the entire West Asian region took a plunge in abyssmal ignorance which lasted for centuries thereafter and perhaps persists to a certain extent even todaythe Arabs are ignorant of their own history of the pre-Muslim era. By a strange euphemism they call it a
period of ignorance and darkness. Probably no other country or culture in the world has deliberately written off a 2,500 year period of their own history by systematically stamping out and snapping all links with the past. They have wiped the memories of pre- Muslim era off their minds. So while they chose to remain ignorant of their past ironically enough it is they who dub the pre-Muslim era as a period of ignorance.
Fortunately we can still trace the history of that pre- Islamic Arabia. It is a well known adage that there is no such thing as foolproof destruction of all evidence.
The most important reference work for all aspects of the study of Islam, including pre-Islamic Arabia and the Jahiliyya, is the second edition of Encyclopaedia of Islam (Bearman 1954–2006). Following Islamic historical tradition, most works on Islamic history begin with a discussion of the Jahiliyya, although they often go beyond the Islamic treatment of it. These are often good entryways into the subject for the beginner. Donner 1981 is notable for its comparative and anthropological awareness.
Some more recent works on Islamic history (notably Berkey 2003), while still treating pre-Islamic Arabia, reflect an understanding that the rise of Islam needs to be considered in a wider historical and geographical context. There are many works devoted entirely to discussions of the history of the Arabs and Arabia before Islam, ranging much more widely than the traditional understanding of the Jahiliyya. Hoyland 2001 is approachable for English readers, although Retsö 2003 goes into greater detail. Volumes that collect various studies that first appeared in scholarly journals or other specialist publications, such as Peters 1999 and Kister 1980, are useful not merely for the studies they contain but sometimes for the editor’s introduction and consolidated bibliography. Shahid 1984 argues that the role of the Arabs in late Antiquity and the importance of the spread of Christianity among them has been undervalued.

Sunday, August 7, 2016

Muslims are invaders, deserve no Lands


Sorry Brothers and sisters if I offend you. I have researched for past 24 years or so the theme of religions and how they have controlled humanity. Religions are extreme intense drugs that are used to numb, dumb and bomb humanity to control, subjugate and literally exploit. You can not compel me to like a religion for your extreme love for it. You are free to be religious but do not force me to like a religion. I do not hate the religious followers but I do respect them while I pity their sheer ignorance. I have written papers that can not be published anywhere as academic world is fake, fraudulent wasteful world of talent just to bluff the world.
 
DO NOT BELIEVE the academics, religious scholars and so called promoters or hidden believers who think they are doing all a favor by promoting their "GOD". Frankly today the world does need a god but needs to get rid of this evil
God. We need to cleanse this world of invading forces, extreme pile of armaments in hands of wrong people who are using it in name of religion and this now is also nuclear attack devices and materials. Humanity is on a cliff. I have debated, argued and discussed in vain for years and at end it is all wasteful YOU CAN NOT win these religious blind fanatics. They fool you. They deceive, deny and con you by their bullshit. Do not entertain yourself with images and funny bunnies on social media. FIGHT FOR truth, reveal the truth and work hard to expose the bastards, the crooks and specially the very long bearded thugs. RELIGIONS are nothing but 1000 times potent weapons than nukes, intense drugs and all other magical potions..
 
YOU ARE FREE TO HATE ME if you like BUT you can not take my rights to expose the False, the ugly and the evil. I fight for Natives of this world, for rights of aboriginal natives whose lands have been claimed, robbed and taken over by so called organized Religious forces. I am not against these innocent PROGRAMMED followers but their false doctrine that has been ingrained in them like a planted chip device in their system. Following is a very interesting image that speaks volumes. If you are a genuine and intelligent person with knowledge of the real history of this world you would support this cause.
 
It is not only Muslims but Europeans who have invaded much of the world and claim as their own. I will give my life for cause of Native people of Canada, USA, Mexico and Much of the South America, India, South and SE Asia and Africa and most of the Mediterreanean occoupied by European settlers and Islamic invaders. NATIVE PEOPLE MUST UNITE and claim their heritage, their lands and their civilizations and DO NOT be oppressed by the thugs, looters, violent armed terrorists who use Christ and Islam to over power undefended Native populations. Ask a friend to like this page to expose the truth and enlighten the world that THINKS it knows it all while all these TV and Media is blaring bull crap of naked women and false drama stories. Lets face the real life.


Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Indian media inclination to destroy Hindu India and promote Islamic Christian interests

It is for the Indian Media that tilts in favor of some other communities like Communists, Leftists, Islamic followers, Converted Hindus into Christianity and any one who is not from Organic faith of Native India. Hence to expect any news or events related to genocide and ripping of Hindu rights would never ever be in any news in India and rest of South Asia. Non Muslim and non Christians are the most passive participants in so called democratic system hence their rights would be trampled and ripped off.

Indian media is geared to spread disinformation on Hindu India and call them Hindu fanatics while it pumps up the fanatic Christian and Islamic interests as victims.

Turkish people's tragedy

Türk arazi Trajedisi Turkish people's tragedy.
The great tragedy of Intelligent Turks vs. the oppressive Fanatic Erdogan's evil empire and his 600 Million $ palace.
How tragic. Most Turks with education were against the oppressive Erdogan but he won by tricking poorer resourceless Turks who are usually very "Muslim" for being induced by their "religious" preachers and Erdogan with their support tricked and got into power and now the liberated, Good people of Turkey, those who... really know all about the evil history and abuses of Turkish empire wanted to get rid. But hey do not worry, ERDOGAN and his oppression will not be permanent.
Turkish people are very smart. They will win. Viva Turg people
Türk insanı çok akıllı. Onlar kazanacak.
Yaşasın Türk halkı

Arya Samaj Scholar and teacher who was a Muslim Priest 30 years ago

Here you have an enlightened gentleman. He is Pandit Mahendra Pal from UP India. He was born in a Muslim Family and he was a Muslim priest. Soon enough he realized that the world around him was mostly artificial, fake and ridiculous unscientifically unreligious. There on he digged and found out Vedik Knowledge and he became a master of Aryan Vedic scriptures and since he is from India his genes are already pure Indian and since then he has not looked back. Muslims of India have a lot to learn from this scholar. I have studied South Asian, SE Asian Muslims in details 99.98 % converted Muslims and almost all of them have no real knowledge of Islamic literature and thought. They merely folllow it by following what they have heard. There is a scope for light and there are millions of Muslim borns who are interested to learn of other philosophies and ideas.
Arya Samaj Scholar and teacher
Pandit Mahendra Pal Arya is member of Arya Samaj. He is preaching Vedas, Comparative Religious Studies and removing confusions about Vaidik Sanskriti and Sanatan Dharma from last 29 Years.

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

What is real essence of "an Islamic Society?"

What is real essence of "an Islamic Society?"
Can Islamic society change and evolve with better practices  if its people are allowed and encouraged to introspect, criticize and evaluate the options?
Islamic society is not really a society to start with. It is an imbalanced system where; men driven, by a sick doctrine "follow" the book but since nobody can understand a cryptic stupid language of very basic raw life, the men deviate from its real meaning and only use it to draw their own conclusions. It is not different from some poorly written laws that are never understood by anyone and thus they are abused. Islamic society is basically based on an old beduin culture a subset of an old, extremely poor Arabian desert setup where there were no laws, only these camel, that goat and these women are "MINE" and if you intrude I will kill you. If the other party was stronger he would kill that man and he would take his herd, including women, as slave. This is the only real mind set that has prevailed and it is still live, living in certain Sahara tribes, where I have been and see how the things are still out of this world. From surface it may all look modern but the idea of that herd man with his animals and women is still continuing - a Muslim man thinks he OWNS his women and there is no difference between a woman and a slave. In fact Slavery is very much alive in almost all Muslim societies in different variables.

 The Saudis still own black African Abassinians [Habashis] slaves who are also castrated at times so that they do not mate with their women. Other Muslims those who can or have power try to maintain multiple slaves and women. In many Arabic speaking areas they also maintain male lovers. This is not a fantasy or a movie plot but very real. Mindset of converted Muslim is a mimicry of his Arab principal whom he tries to copy and he tries his best to behave like an Arab Muslim herdsman, and consider a woman he "wants" his property. If another fellow likes that property - then there is a battle and that woman goes to become property of other one.
Read Indian  [that includes West North India now known as Pakistan and East India Part known as Bangladesh] history and see how cruel lives these Islamic invaders and all their soldiers lived and how they tortured Hindu women and abused, murdered Hindu men for minor pretexts, when ever a Hindu woman was liked by a Muslim man with even minor power, her husband was given a choice and if he dint agree, he was killed mercilessly and his property and wife became property of this man.
This has been going on in India that is now known as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh and India. This is a tale of tragedy, horror and extreme pain. Islam on paper is a "religious doctrine" but in reality it is a very basic system of few simple rules and if anyone does not follow those rules he is punished.
That is why to consider this as a religion is a grave mistake. It is a shadowed dark idea of life that has everything black from clothes to mind to soul and everything is death, destruction and tragedy.
The converted Muslims behave in horrible ways and overdo and are dumb enough to believe they are being very religious by going by the book but they are in most cases totally oblivious of any real "religious purity" and any spiritual aspect is as missing as honesty and truthfulness in modern corrupt society. Islamic society is not a social system but a mode to oppress, pillage, control, subjugate and squeeze the basic rights of women, children, animals and all Men in every sense. To fool the world, they device million stories to obfuscate and hide the truth; which foolish gullible liberals believe and let them keep oppressing.

Is Islam for all people of the world?

Is Islam for all people of the world?
No it was not for Non Arabic Speaking people.
Islam has been used to plunder gold, assets and women of other cultures and destroy their temples and places of worship and install Islamic momument on top of them. Entire history of Islam is history of invasion, destruction, loot, appropriation of foreign lands, assets, women and animals and enslavement and murder of men and children. Originally the Quran was meant to be a holy book for Arabs only. Read on below
Muslims are tirelessly promoting Islam and claim that soon it will dominate the world. In doing so, they go against the Quran. Therefore, it is fair to say they are kafir.
Brother Ali Sina, who studied Islam in minucious details researched on this issue and found following revelations:
The Quran 10:47 says,
And for every people there is a Messenger.
And 14: 4 says,
And WE have not sent any Messenger except with revelation in the language of his people in order that he might make things clear to them.
If these verses are true, then Islam is not for non-Arabs. The Quran attests that every people have received their divine message in their own language so they can understand it and the Quran is for Arabs.
This concept is so important that it is repeated numerous times.
Q. 16:36.
And WE did raise among every people a Messenger
Q. 5:48
For each of you WE prescribed a clear spiritual Law and a manifest way in secular matters
Q. 32:3
It [the Quran] is the truth from your Lord; that you [Muhammad] may warn a people to whom no Warner has come before you, that they may be guided.
Q. 36.6
[This is a revelation] That thou mayest warn a people whose fathers were not warned, and so they are heedless.
These verses leave no room for misunderstanding. Allah is saying that every people has had their own messenger who warned them in their own language, and that Muhammad is for those who have not yet received any guidance, and whose fathers were not warned, i.e. the Arabs. In this way they won’t have any excuse and can’t say, but we did not receive any message.
Q. 6: 156- 157 explain,
Lest you should say, `The Book was sent down only to two peoples before us, (Jews and Christians) and we were indeed unaware of what they read.
Or lest you should say, `Had the Book been sent down to us, we should surely have been better guided than they.’ There has now come to you a clear evidence from your Lord and a guidance and a mercy.
The Quran is clear only to Arabs. Non Arabs don’t understand it. Muslims insist that no translation of the Quran can be accurate. Hence, it can never be clear to non-Arabs. That makes sense because it is not intended for non-Arabs.
Another confirmation that the Quran was sent only for the Arabs is in verses 26: 198-199
And if WE had sent it down to one of the non-Arabs, and he had read it to them, they would never have believed in it.
Just as Arabs have no reason to believe in a book written in a non-Arab language, non-Arabs have no reason to believe in a book written in Arabic. That is why Allah sends a messenger to each people in their own language so they understand. That makes perfect sense.
To make sure there is no misunderstanding the Quran 5:19 reiterates:
O People of the Book, there indeed has come to you Our Messenger, after a break in the series of Messengers, who makes things clear to you lest you should say, `There has come to us no bearer of glad tidings and no Warner.’ So a bearer of glad tidings and a warner has indeed come to you. And ALLAH has power over all things.
According to the Quran all people have received a revelation. The above verse says the Quran is for those who never received a revelation, lest they should say, `There has come to us no bearer of glad tidings and no Warner’.
This matter is clear, but Allah wants it to be clear even to the dumbest of people. He names the exact geographic location for which Muhammad was sent.
Q. 6:92
And this is a Book which WE have revealed, full of blessings, to fulfill that which preceded it, and to enable thee to warn the Mother of towns and those around it. أُمَّ الْقُرَى وَمَنْ حَوْلَهَا
The mother of towns, Umul Qura, is Mecca. This verse says Islam was sent to warn Mecca and its surrounding حَوْلَهَا. How can it be for all mankind?
Now this point is clear even to the dumbest of people, But "Allah" knows some people are really stupid and he wants to make this matter clear even to them. So he repeats the same thing in verse 42:7
Thus have WE revealed to you the Qur’an in Arabic, that you may warn the Mother of towns, and all those around it.
I heard some Muslims say, around it means everywhere. That is not the definition of around it. When we say Rome and around it, we don’t include Paris, London, Tokyo and New York as Romes surroundings. Those who bring this argument are saying that Allah says something and means something else. In other words he is deceiving people. The Quran repeatedly claims to be a “clear book” (5:15) “easy to understand” (44:58 , 54:22 , 54:32, 54:40) “explained in detail” (6:114), “conveyed clearly”, (5:16, 10:15) and with “no doubt” in it (2:1).
Now, I am sure some Muslims can quote other verses that say Islam is for all mankind. If they do so, they will prove that the above verses are false.

REFUGEES are destroying a new apartment

DONALD TRUMP WAS RIGHT !!
THIS IS ITALY !!!!!
REFUGEES are destroying a new apartment that was given to him by the municipality ' cause it's not up to their standards..... Where as the Italians are kicked out from their homes and sent to sleep under bridges !!!!!
#SHAREIT

https://www.facebook.com/daise1000/videos/1692202124363564/

Erdogan stages a constitutional coup

Erdogan stages a constitutional coup. Declares a 'State of Emergency' which means he will be able to rule by decree, bypassing parliament and the judiciary.
Well played Sultan, well played.
The world had forgotten 600 years of Ottoman barbarism over the Bulgars, Arabs, Kurds, Armenians, Greeks and Slavs. By the time its 100 year anniversary of the 1923 AtaTurk Republic, the Caliphate will be back and this time it will not be the 'Sick Man of Europe', but Europe's Son-in-Law that will rule over the 'Sick men of Europe'.

http://f24.my/2avdL4R

The real social status of women in Islamic countries

The real social status of women in Islamic countries
A so called religion's purpose is to connect with God but Islam does anything but that. Instead it teaches men to abuse children, women and encourages slavery and above all treat them in the most inhuman way possible. Obviously social pictures of a few rich and famous show bejewelled women who look very lavish but the reality is very very different inside the veil.
Majority of Muslim women, as much as 89% suffer more than... any other women born under any other social system or so called religious faith. On surface and text books, news media and public statements talk of great love and peace and nobility towards women. However the reality is that women are considered like 2nd hand shoes once worn and can be thrown or just placed in a shoe box as the man pleases. All these so called "religious" pretexts" and excuses that are published and quoted 24 hours by Islamic clergy and men is an entire bullshit that does not do anything but serves their nefarious purposes of abusing women in any way they can.
The face shown to the world is one of shyful niqabs and Purdah etc. and happy bunch of giggling women herded by long bearded men. However what is the ground reality?
The reality is that most Muslim women are coerced, violated, forced, raped and treated worse than enslaved women. As long as she is young and attractive she has a little value but once she is slightly old or has a child etc. or sick, men discards her as if she was a dead fly.
Muslim women have no real rights at all. The whole show that is shown to the world is a farce and a ridiculous public relation exercise, going on for past almost 13 centuries.

Selling of little girls, innocent women like cattle

People around the world are insensitive and quiet as if it was a common news. Selling of little girls, innocent women like cattle is not a symbolic devilishness of Islamic state but it is the actual reality of Islam. Look at the history from day one and the entire Islamic discourse is based on how to exploit, plunder, rape and enslave women. The world that is now quiet on this extremely hidden subject must now wake up as your own daughters and sisters could be in line for sale by the coming invading Islamic warriors who are currently portraying themselves as meek refugees but inside majority is a monsterous wolf hiding who will rip apart any civil society.
Any so called Western politicians, Apologizers and Islamic supporters are unperturbed as their own daughters are not yet ripped apart. Well just wait for a little time and they will see what happens in any neighbourhood near them.


http://pamelageller.com/2016/07/virgin-beautiful-12-years-old-she-will-be-sold-soon-in-islamic-slave-market.html/

Islam is not the fastest growing but fastest dying religious group

There are not thousands but Millions of Converts - recent and older generations in Black Africa who would like to leave, but what the world does not know is that most educated North Africans of Berber origin who previously were converted by Turks and Arabs, are interested to leave. The problems are no democracy and no social system that can sustain such apostates. Turkey has 30 to 40 % population too. The worst are converts specially the recent Bosnian, Albanian, Kosovans & of course in South and South East Asia who are more fanatic than the Arab Muslims.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnAfsjZZ0c8

Islamic Burqa is not by will or volition of women

NO sane woman ever uses Burqa or any cover except when she has to go certain places where Muslim men are present. Most emanicipated and 'freed' Muslim women who understand the fake theories of Islam; do not want to live under its stupid man created dictates. 99% of Muslim women hate the imposed so called Islamic restrictions with pretexts of a fake religion. On surface they will never admit or for their ignorance and poor understanding will be angry but in reality they wonder what Islam gives them.

Zakir Naik a dangerous man than many thousand hard core terrorists

This man an Indian citizen is a persona non grata in a few countries already but Indian Governing administration must solicit a total ban against his travels by issuing an alert as this man is equal to 10.000 terrorists. He is a dangerous man who is literally twice more dangerous than a Pakistan with the capacity of damage. This man is loved by Saudis and Pakistani terror groups. The network he has spread all over South Asia specially India is so vast that it may take a year to gauge its active members.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NI4GtRwfazk&feature=share

Defining a Gentleman called Tarek Fatah

Defining a Gentleman called Tarek Fatah - Jayen to Jayen Kahan?
Can we create a new category for people who are deprogrammed and have adhered to their spirit se...lf?
While it is true Muslims and Christians in South Asia specially are highly programmed creatures for not having a mind or not having been encouraged to have a thinking mind. That said not all fit in that category.
Know one thing only that having a "MUSLIM" or Arab name does not necessarily translate to being a linear follower of "political Islam". While one is logically right to label all Muslims as "terrorists or sympathizers" well they are sandviched between obnoxious and ethical, there is room for those who are born in "islamic" family or culture but they are not really so.

There are certain things that are beyond the so called Christianity or Islam or any proselytized faith.
Tarek Fatah is not alone but he perhaps is the tip of a big iceberg of Tarek Fatahs who can not be seen easily but they are like a a musical theme of fusion that can not be labelled under any known category or even genre.
Not all "Muslims" or "Christians" or Judaic Followers are fanatic or blind believer in the religious thought. There are some or rather many Muslims e.g. who are almost like trapped and they are more spirit oriented than book oriented. Tarek Fatah is more like that legendary bird that flies above the skies
There are a few things that hurt us a big deal yet we can never know what is it that hurts and this is one of those undefinable aspects of life that can not be worded however and perhaps we need to find a few new words to define the undefined. One sure thing one can add here is that there are now millions of ATHEISTS in "Islamic" world just as there are in "Christian" world who have no where to go and they park thems
elves under the label of "Atheist" just to get going so that they are not considered directionless floating boats in thought world.

Twitter profile for latest news and articles

https://twitter.com/DrNailaHussain

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

Latin Americans be careful of Islamic trap - Latino Americanos; tener cuidado con la trampa islámica

One of the many ways to prepare new activists from Latin America. They usually trap innocent victims. The messages in Spanish from victims show that they are naive and want to work in "aggressive" ways

Una de las muchas maneras de preparar nuevos activistas de América Latina. Por lo general, trampa de víctimas inocentes. Los mensajes en español de las víctimas; muestran que son ingenuos y quieren trabajar de manera "agresiva"



https://www.facebook.com/IslamEnSpanish/

Is polygamy real? How many women a Muslim male can have?

A so called religion's purpose is to connect with God but Islam does anything but that. Instead it teaches men to abuse children, women  and encourages slavery and above all treat them in the most inhuman way possible. Obviously social pictures of a few rich and famous show bejewelled women who look very lavish but the reality is very very different inside the veil.

Majority of Muslim women, as much as 89% suffer more than any other women born under any other social system or so called religious faith.  On surface and text books, news media and public statements talk of great love and peace and nobility towards women. However the reality is that women are considered like 2nd hand shoes once worn and can be thrown or just placed in a shoe box as the man pleases. All these so called "religious" pretexts"  and excuses that are published and quoted 24 hours by Islamic clergy and men is an entire bullshit that does not do anything but serves their nefarious purposes of abusing women in any way they can.

The face shown to the world is one of shyful niqabs and Purdah etc. and happy bunch of giggling women herded by long bearded men. However what is the ground reality?
The reality is that most Muslim women are coerced, violated, forced, raped and treated worse than enslaved women. As long as she is young and attractive she has a little value but once she is slightly old or has a child etc. or sick, men discards her as if she was a dead fly.
Muslim women have no real rights at all. The whole show that is shown to the world is a farce and a ridiculous public relation exercise, going on for past almost 13 centuries.

Polygamy

Does Islam permit a man to have more than one wife?
Yes. A Muslim man can marry as many as four women and have sexual relations with an unspecified number of slaves as well. Muhammad had eleven wives at one time.
Quran
Quran (4:3) - "Marry of the women, who seem good to you, two or three or four; and if ye fear that ye cannot do justice (to so many) then one (only) or (the captives) that your right hands possess." This verse plainly allows a man to have up to four wives (Allah conveniently granted Muhammad an exception... on the authority of Muhammad, of course). According to the Hadith, the "justice" spoken of merely refers to the dowry provided the bride, not the treatment accorded following the wedding.
Quran (4:129) - "Ye are never able to be fair and just as between women, even if it is your ardent desire" Underscores that a man is not able to treat multiple wives fairly. He would therefore be unable to acquire more than one wife if this were a requirement - which it is not. In fact, Muhammad was not able to treat his own wives fairly (see Additional Notes).
Quran (66:5) - "Maybe, his Lord, if he divorce you, will give him in your place wives better than you, submissive, faithful, obedient, penitent, adorers, fasters, widows and virgins" A disobedient wife can be replaced. A man can only have up to four wives, but he can rotate as many women as he pleases in and out of the lineup.


Hadith and Sira
Bukhari (62:2) - Provides the context for verse 4:3 of the Quran. "Dealing justly" is defined within a financial context. It refers to providing a fair dowry to secure marriage - not to the equal or fair treatment of wives (which is impossible according to verse 4:129).
Bukhari (5:268) - "The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number." I asked Anas, "Had the Prophet the strength for it?" Anas replied, "We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty men." Muhammad had a "special rule" that allowed him to have at least eleven wives. (His successors had more than four wives at a time as well.)
Bukhari (62:6) - "The Prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives."
Bukhari (77:598) - "Allah's Apostle said, "No woman should ask for the divorce of her sister (Muslim) so as to take her place, but she should marry the man (without compelling him to divorce his other wife)" Polygamy is firmly established in the Islamic tradition.
Notes
The practice of polygamy is a mathematical contradiction of the principle that men and women are to be treated equally. The Quran's allowance of multiple wives is therefore somewhat of a challenge to the contemporary apologist, who wants his Western audience to believe that Islam encourages gender equality. Often, the first ploy is a weak claim that Islam is the only religion to encourage monogamy - based on the snippet of verse 4:3 which says "marry only one."
In fact, this is not true. In the first place, the New Testament plainly states that the model Christian is the "husband of but one woman" to whom he should be faithful (ie. no exception for sex slaves, as the Quran allows). Secondly, the very Quranic verse from which the fragment "marry only one" is pulled is actually the very one that goes on to say that up to four wives are allowed as long as they "seem good" to the man!
At this point, the apologist usually falls back on defending polygamy itself - claiming that it reduces prostitution, for example - while effectively conceding that are not equal in Islam. After all, why would Allah procreate women and men at an equal rate if marriages were meant to have ratios as high as 4:1? The Quran also gives devout Muslim men license to capture women and use them as sex slaves, lest four wives prove insufficient.

A preacher in 'moderate' Tunisa recently claimed that is every Muslim man's divine right "to take a concubine along with his wife and to enjoy the ones that their right hands possess." He went to add that "the concubine is the most effective solution to restore the social and moral balance of society."
Nowhere does the Quran allow an existing wife (or wives) any veto power in her husband's choice of additional sexual partners. In fact, it discourages it by twice presenting an episode from Muhammad's live in which his wives "angered Allah" with their jealousy. (Allah took a remarkable interest in Muhammad's life, devoting passages from the eternal Quran to his personal comfort).
The prophet of Islam had many wives (nine of whom outlived him) and the bickering in this unhappy arrangement is well-chronicled. At one point, his wives were so upset by Muhammad's taking a slave girl to one of their own bedrooms that Allah had to step in and whisper parts of suras 33 and 66 in his ear, including the threat to divorce them all if they didn't allow him complete sexual freedom.
There are worse things in the world than polygamy (which has been practiced by many cultures outside of Islam), but it is shocking to see a religion place such high value on a man's base sexual desire that he is permitted to bring other women into the marriage bed just to satisfy his lust. As pointed out, women are not allowed the same freedom to seek sexual satisfaction from alternate sources should their husband lose interest or capacity.
The Western world has decided that polygamy devalues a woman's worth. In Islam, however, a woman's worth is often the sum of her sexual value to her husband.

Muslim men have license to beat or turture their slaves, wifes and any woman they employ

Some contemporary Muslim apologists often squirm over this relatively straightforward verse from the Quran (4:34) - which gives men the right to beat their wives if they even have a "fear" of disloyalty or disobedience.  Their rhetorical aerobics inspired us to write a separate article:
 
Wife Beating Good Enough for Muhammad, Good Enough for You
 
 Others are not nearly as squeamish.  Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradhawi, one of the most respected Muslim clerics in the world, once made the famous (and somewhat ridiculous statement) that "It is forbidden to beat the woman, unless it is necessary."  He went on to say that  "one may beat only to safeguard Islamic behavior," leaving no doubt that wife-beating is a matter of religious sanction.
 
 Dr. Muzammil Saddiqi, the former president of ISNA (the Islamic Society of North America), a mainstream Muslim organization, says it is important that a wife "recognizes the authority of her husband in the house" and that he may use physical force if he is "sure it would improve the situation."  (source)
 
 Sheikh Dr. Ahmad Muhammad Ahmad Al-Tayyeb, the head of Al-Azhar, Sunni Islam's most prestigious institution says that "light beatings" and "punching" are part of a program to "reform the wife" (source). 
 
 Dr. Jamal Badawi endorses corporal punishment as  "another measure that may save the marriage" (source).   He isn't clear on how striking a woman will make her more inclined toward staying with her assailant, unless the implication is fear of more serious consequences if she leaves.
 
 Egyptian cleric, Abd al-Rahman Mansour, said in a 2012 televised broadcast that, in addition to discouraging the wife from filing divorce, beatings would inspire the wife to "treat him with kindness and respect, and know that her husband has a higher status than her."
 
 During Ramadan of 2010, another cleric named Sa'd Arafat actually said the woman is "honored" by the beating (source).  No one else seemed terribly surprised or upset by this.
 
 An undercover report from progressive Sweden in 2012 found that 60% of mosques there actually advised beaten women not to report the abuse to the police.  These women were also told that they must submit to non-consensual 'sex' with their husbands. 
 
 In the birthplace of Islam, about half of Saudi women are beaten at home.  "Hands and sticks were found to be used mostly in beating women, following by men’s head cover and to a lesser extent, sharp objects." (source)
 In 2016, the Council of Islamic Ideology proposed a bill - ironically named the Protection of Women against Violence Act - that actually included exceptions for "lightly beating" defiant wives.  (source)
 
 According to Islamic law, a husband may strike his wife for any one of the following four reasons:

- She does not attempt to make herself beautiful for him (ie. "let's herself go")
 - She refuses to meet his sexual demands
 - She leaves the house without his permission or for a "legitimate reason"
 - She neglects her religious duties

Any of these are also sufficient grounds for divorce.
 
 Respected Quran scholars in the past interpreted verse 4:34 with impressive candor.  Tabari said that it means to "admonish them, but if they refused to repent, then tie them up in their homes and beat them until they obey Allah’s commands toward you."  Qurtubi told wife-beaters to avoid breaking bones, if possible, but added that "it is not a crime if it leads to death."
 
 Muslim apologists sometimes say that Muhammad ordered that women not be harmed, but they are actually basing this on what he said before or during a battle, such as in  Bukhari (59:447), when Muhammad issued a command for all the men of Quraiza be killed and the women and children taken as slaves.  (Having your husband murdered and being forced into sexual slavery apparently doesn't qualify as "harm" under the Islamic model).
 
 But, in fact, there are a number of cases in which Muhammad did have women killed in the most brutal fashion.  One was Asma bint Marwan, a mother or five, who wrote a poem criticizing the Medinans for accepting Muhammad after he had ordered the murder of an elderly man.  In this case, the prophet's assassins literally pulled a sleeping infant from her breast and stabbed her to death.
 
 After taking Mecca in 630, Muhammad also ordered the murder of a slave girl who had merely made up songs mocking him.  The Hadith are rife with accounts of women planted in the ground on Muhammad's command and pelted to death with stones for sexual immorality - yet the prophet of Islam actually encouraged his own men to rape women captured in battle (Abu Dawood 2150, Muslim  3433) and did not punish them for killing non-Muslim women (as Khalid ibn Walid did on several occasions - see Ibn Ishaq 838 and 856).
 
 In summary, according to the Qur'an, Hadith and Islamic law, a woman may indeed have physical harm done to her if the circumstances warrant, with one such allowance being in the case of disobedience.  This certainly does not mean that all Muslim men beat their wives, only that Islam permits them to do so.